Browse all questions
Every question with its answer and explanation — study by topic or all at once.
Illness Reporting
39 questionsCalifornia law and the FDA Food Code list five reportable symptoms: vomiting, diarrhea, jaundice, sore throat with fever, and an open or infected wound containing pus that is not properly covered. A mild headache by itself is not on that list.
Cal. H&S Code §113949.1An employee excluded for vomiting or diarrhea may return only after being symptom-free for at least 24 hours without the help of medication that masks symptoms. Feeling better, eating a meal, or waiting only 12 hours is not enough under the Retail Food Code.
Cal. H&S Code §113949.1The FDA Food Code and California law require employees to report diagnosis or exposure to six specific pathogens: Norovirus, Hepatitis A, Shigella spp., Shiga-toxin producing E. coli (STEC), Salmonella Typhi, and nontyphoidal Salmonella, which was added in 2017.
Cal. H&S Code §113949.1Jaundice is a reportable symptom often linked to Hepatitis A. The Retail Food Code requires full EXCLUSION (not just restriction) from the facility and notification to the regulatory authority. The employee cannot return until cleared by the health department.
Cal. H&S Code §113949.1A wound with pus must be covered with an impermeable (water-resistant) bandage AND a single-use glove or finger cot. A fabric bandage or paper towel is not impermeable and is not enough. Sanitizer is not designed for skin and does not cover the wound.
Cal. H&S Code §113949.2California law and the FDA Food Code require the Person in Charge to immediately notify the local health department (the regulatory authority) when an employee is diagnosed with Norovirus, Hepatitis A, Shigella, STEC, Salmonella Typhi, or nontyphoidal Salmonella. This protects the public and lets the health department investigate possible exposure.
Cal. H&S Code §113949.3Sore throat WITH fever generally requires RESTRICTION (not full exclusion) in facilities that do not serve highly susceptible populations. The employee can still perform tasks that do not involve food or food-contact surfaces. In facilities serving the elderly, young children, or the immunocompromised, exclusion is required.
Cal. H&S Code §113949.1The employee's legal duty is to report immediately to the person in charge any of the five reportable symptoms, a diagnosed Big 6 illness, exposure to an outbreak, or living with someone who has a Big 6 illness. Waiting, self-diagnosing, or hiding the illness violates the Retail Food Code and puts customers at risk.
Cal. H&S Code §113949.2The FDA Food Code defines a Highly Susceptible Population (HSP) as people who are more likely than the general public to be severely affected by foodborne illness: preschool-age children, older adults in nursing homes or assisted-living, and immunocompromised individuals (such as those with cancer or HIV). Facilities serving HSPs must EXCLUDE, not just restrict, employees with sore throat and fever.
FDA Food Code §2-201An employee diagnosed with any Big 6 illness may not return until the regulatory authority (local health department) and/or a licensed medical practitioner provides medical clearance, often after follow-up testing. The 24-hour symptom-free rule alone applies to vomiting/diarrhea WITHOUT a Big 6 diagnosis.
Cal. H&S Code §113949.4CDC outbreak investigations repeatedly identify ill food workers, especially those with Norovirus, as a leading contributing factor in restaurant outbreaks. Other common factors include improper time and temperature control, cross-contamination, contaminated equipment, and food from an unsafe source.
California law requires employees to report not only their own diagnoses but also exposure: living with or having close contact with someone who has a Big 6 illness. The person in charge must report this to the health authority, which will decide whether the employee should be excluded, tested, or vaccinated.
Cal. H&S Code §113949.2CDC surveillance data consistently identify Norovirus as the leading cause of foodborne illness in the U.S. It spreads very easily through the fecal-oral route, even from tiny amounts of vomit or stool, which is why an infected food worker who handles ready-to-eat food can sicken many customers. Norovirus symptoms (vomiting, watery diarrhea) usually start 12 to 48 hours after exposure.
Shiga-toxin producing E. coli, including O157:H7, can cause severe bloody diarrhea that progresses in some patients (especially young children) to hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), which can lead to kidney failure. Because of this serious complication, STEC is one of the Big 6 illnesses, and an infected employee must be excluded until cleared by the health authority.
Under FDA Food Code §2-201, a sore throat with fever is a reportable symptom. In facilities that do NOT serve a highly susceptible population, the worker is RESTRICTED — she may stay in the building but cannot work with food, food-contact surfaces, or single-use items. Exclusion is only required when a highly susceptible population (HSP) is served.
FDA Food Code §2-201A Highly Susceptible Population (HSP) is a group more likely to suffer serious illness from foodborne pathogens because of age or weakened immunity. Examples include nursing home residents, hospital patients, immunocompromised individuals, preschool-age children in custodial care, and pregnant women in such facilities. HSP settings trigger STRICTER rules — for example, sore throat with fever requires exclusion, not just restriction.
FDA Food Code §2-201 requires that an employee with vomiting or diarrhea be EXCLUDED until they have been symptom-free for at least 24 hours without using symptom-suppressing medication. Medication can mask symptoms while the worker is still shedding pathogens, so a chemically suppressed worker is still considered ill.
FDA Food Code §2-201Jaundice is a Big 6 reportable symptom strongly associated with Hepatitis A. The FDA Food Code requires that a food employee with jaundice be excluded until at least 7 days have passed since jaundice first appeared AND the regulatory authority or a medical practitioner approves return. If Hepatitis A is confirmed, additional medical clearance is required.
Hepatitis A virus has an incubation period of 15-50 days (average ~28). An infected food worker can shed the virus through stool for weeks before jaundice appears, contaminating ready-to-eat foods unnoticed. Because Hep A is vaccine-preventable, CDC recommends vaccination for food handlers, especially after a known exposure or outbreak.
An open cut on the hand must be cleaned, covered with an IMPERMEABLE (waterproof) bandage, and then enclosed by a single-use glove or finger cot. This double barrier prevents both blood and bacteria from contacting food. A wound on other parts of the body must be covered with an impermeable cover plus clothing. If the wound is infected or pus-filled, the employee must be excluded from food work.
When two or more people experience the same illness after eating food prepared or served at a facility, it meets the standard CDC/FDA definition of a suspected foodborne outbreak. The Person-in-Charge must immediately notify the local health department, preserve any suspect food and production records, and cooperate fully with the investigation. Concealing evidence is unlawful.
California Labor Code §6310 and §6311 prohibit retaliation, including firing, against an employee who reports unsafe conditions to the employer or a government agency, or who refuses to perform hazardous work. Combined with FDA Food Code §2-201 (which makes illness reporting a duty), a food worker who reports symptoms or refuses to handle food while sick is legally protected from retaliation.
Cal. Labor Code §6310FDA Food Code §2-201 requires food employees to report not only diagnoses and symptoms, but also EXPOSURE to outbreaks of Norovirus, Hepatitis A, Shigella, Shiga-toxin E. coli, Salmonella Typhi, and nontyphoidal Salmonella. Reporting an exposure even without symptoms allows the PIC and health department to monitor and prevent further spread, since some pathogens shed before symptoms appear.
FDA Food Code §2-201Employee health and illness reporting is a PREREQUISITE program — a foundational sanitation/operational practice that must be in place for HACCP to work. CCPs control specific hazards (cooking temperatures, etc.), but if a sick employee contaminates ready-to-eat food, no CCP downstream will catch a virus like Norovirus. Strong health policy is the foundation of food safety.
FDA Food Code §2-201 expects the PIC to maintain a written or electronic Employee Health Policy/log documenting symptom and diagnosis reports, exposure reports, dates, and the action taken (restriction, exclusion, return-to-work approval). Health inspectors routinely ask to see these records. Employers should NOT keep private medical charts — only the information needed for food-safety compliance.
FDA Food Code §2-201CDC investigations consistently list poor personal hygiene by sick food workers among the top contributing factors to foodborne outbreaks, along with improper holding temperatures, contaminated equipment, food from unsafe sources, and inadequate cooking. Mandatory illness reporting and exclusion/restriction policies directly target this factor by keeping ill workers from contaminating food.
California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 17 lists communicable diseases that physicians, laboratories, and certain establishments must report to local health departments. Beyond the FDA Big 6, Title 17 includes additional agents such as Listeria monocytogenes and Hepatitis E. A PIC may not be the direct reporter for diagnosis, but should know that California adds reportable diseases beyond the federal Food Code list.
Nontyphoidal Salmonella (causing salmonellosis) is most commonly linked to raw or undercooked POULTRY and EGGS, and also raw produce and unpasteurized dairy. It is one of the FDA Big 6: an infected food employee must be EXCLUDED until medically cleared by the regulatory authority or a medical practitioner and free of vomiting/diarrhea for at least 24 hours. Diagnosis-based exclusions require formal clearance, not just self-assessment.
California Health & Safety Code §113949 et seq. incorporates the FDA Food Code 2-201.11 'Big 6' reportable diagnoses for retail food workers: (1) Norovirus, (2) Hepatitis A virus (HAV), (3) Shigella species, (4) Salmonella Typhi (the cause of typhoid fever), (5) nontyphoidal Salmonella (added in the 2013 Food Code), and (6) Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC, including O157:H7). These six are flagged because they are highly transmissible by the fecal-oral route, can be shed asymptomatically, and have caused major U.S. restaurant outbreaks. When a food employee is diagnosed with any of the six, the person in charge MUST notify the local health department and exclude the employee from work; written medical clearance is required before return. Option B lists respiratory pathogens, which are not on the Big 6 list (although they may trigger general sick-leave). Option C lists serious but non-reportable foodborne pathogens. Option D lists parasites, which can cause illness but are not in the Big 6 reporting trigger list.
FDA Food Code 2-201.11; HSC §113949.1California Retail Food Code HSC §113949.1 requires the person in charge to EXCLUDE — not merely restrict — any food employee with jaundice that has onset in the past 7 days, and to report the case to the local health department. Jaundice is the classic late symptom of Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection; HAV is one of the Big 6 reportable pathogens, transmitted fecal-orally, and has caused multiple California restaurant outbreaks resulting in mass post-exposure vaccination campaigns. The 7-day onset window matters because HAV is most contagious in the 2 weeks BEFORE jaundice appears and remains contagious for about a week after, so a recently-jaundiced worker is still shedding virus. Option A endangers customers. Option B is non-compliant because exclusion (full removal from premises) is required, not just restriction to back-of-house. Option D underestimates HAV's infectious period — 24 hours of rest does nothing to eliminate viral shedding. Medical clearance is mandatory before return; HAV antibody testing or proof of recovery is the standard documentation.
HSC §113949.1FDA Food Code 2-201.13(A)(1), adopted into California's Retail Food Code via HSC §113949.1, permits a food employee who was excluded for vomiting or diarrhea WITHOUT a Big 6 diagnosis to return to work when they have been ASYMPTOMATIC for at least 24 hours. Most California operators apply a 48-hour rule as a best practice because norovirus can be shed in stool for 48 hours after symptoms resolve and is the leading cause of unconfirmed acute gastroenteritis in foodservice — the 48-hour gap dramatically lowers the residual risk. The employee should not return earlier even if they feel well (option A), because pathogen shedding outlasts symptoms. Option C (4 hours) is far too short for any gastrointestinal recovery. Option D (one full week) is the requirement for confirmed Big 6 cases with a positive culture, NOT for unconfirmed gastroenteritis. If the employee IS later diagnosed with Norovirus, Shigella, STEC, Salmonella nontyphoidal, Salmonella Typhi, or Hepatitis A, written medical clearance is required regardless of how long they have been symptom-free.
FDA Food Code 2-201.13FDA Food Code 2-201.11(B) and CRFC HSC §113949.1 require differential treatment of sore throat with fever based on the population served. In a standard restaurant, sore throat with fever is a RESTRICTION (the employee may be reassigned to non-food-contact work). In a Highly Susceptible Population (HSP) facility — defined as nursing homes, assisted-living, hospitals, daycare, preschool — the same symptom triggers full EXCLUSION because the residents are immunocompromised or otherwise at elevated risk from Group A Streptococcus, the bacterium most often associated with febrile pharyngitis. Option A is non-compliant in any setting because the symptom requires at minimum a restriction. Option B is the correct answer for a NON-HSP setting and is the trap distractor — students who do not catch the HSP keyword will choose it. Option C confuses exclusion with restriction; even with a negative strep test, the symptom-driven rule applies until the cause is determined. The employee may return when feverless without medical clearance, or with clearance if pathogen-confirmed.
FDA Food Code 2-201.11; HSC §113949.1California Retail Food Code HSC §113949.1, mirroring FDA Food Code 2-201.13(C), requires that any food employee excluded due to diagnosis with a Big 6 pathogen (Norovirus, Hepatitis A, Shigella, Salmonella Typhi, nontyphoidal Salmonella, or Shiga toxin-producing E. coli) may only return to work after WRITTEN medical clearance from a licensed healthcare provider OR from the local regulatory authority (county health department). The clearance must state that the employee is no longer infectious. For nontyphoidal Salmonella specifically, the typical reinstatement criteria are: asymptomatic for the time required by the regulatory authority OR documented negative stool specimens (the local health department determines exactly how many and how spaced). Option A omits the documentation requirement and applies only to UNDIAGNOSED gastroenteritis, not to Big 6 cases. Option B (verbal) does not satisfy the written-clearance rule. Option D is wrong because home-pharmacy tests are not approved diagnostic confirmation in California. The written-clearance rule protects against return-to-work errors and creates a defensible audit trail.
HSC §113949.1California Retail Food Code HSC §113949.1 (adopting FDA Food Code 2-201.11) names exactly six (sometimes called Big 5+1) reportable pathogens that an employee must disclose upon diagnosis: (1) NOROVIRUS — the leading cause of foodborne illness in the U.S.; (2) HEPATITIS A VIRUS — fecal-oral transmission, can survive on surfaces for weeks; (3) SHIGELLA spp. — extremely low infectious dose (10-100 organisms); (4) SHIGA TOXIN-PRODUCING E. COLI (STEC), including O157:H7 — life-threatening, can cause hemolytic uremic syndrome; (5) SALMONELLA TYPHI (typhoid fever) — chronic carrier risk; and (6) NONTYPHOIDAL SALMONELLA. Option A wrongly includes Hepatitis B (blood-borne, not foodborne) and Listeria (a regulatory concern but not on the employee report list) and mislabels E. coli (only the Shiga-toxin-producing strains are Big 6). Option B includes Hepatitis C (blood-borne) and is incomplete. Option D mixes in toxin-producers (Staph, Bacillus, Clostridium) that are not on the Big 6 reporting list because exclusion is based on the employee's diagnosis, not the toxin's presence in food. Upon a Big 6 diagnosis the PIC must exclude the employee AND notify the local enforcement agency.
HSC §113949.1California Retail Food Code HSC §113949.4 (and FDA Food Code 2-201.13) requires exclusion of a food employee who is experiencing symptoms of vomiting or diarrhea; the employee may return only when asymptomatic for at least 24 hours OR a longer period if required by the local health officer. For confirmed Norovirus or for unconfirmed but suspicious cases, the FDA Food Code recommends 24 hours symptom-free MINIMUM and many California local enforcement agencies and operators apply 48 hours as best practice because Norovirus is shed in stool for up to 2 weeks after recovery, the infectious dose is only 10-100 viral particles, and Norovirus is the leading cause of foodborne outbreaks in U.S. restaurants per CDC data. Option B leaves the decision to feelings, which is non-compliant and dangerously subjective. Option C is excessive and is not the standard. Option D applies a stool-culture standard that is appropriate for Typhoid Salmonella and Shigella but is not used for Norovirus (no widely available clinical Norovirus PCR test is required for return-to-work). For other Big 6 pathogens, return requires written medical clearance from the local health officer.
HSC §113949.4California Retail Food Code HSC §113949.2 and §113949.4 require EXCLUSION (not just restriction) for a food employee diagnosed with Hepatitis A virus (HAV). 'Exclusion' under the code means the employee may not be in the food facility in any role — not dishwashing, not front counter, not cleaning. The reason is that HAV is shed in stool starting 1-2 weeks BEFORE symptoms appear and continuing 1-3 weeks after jaundice onset; the virus is exceptionally hardy (survives on surfaces and on hands for hours to days), the infectious dose is very low, and contamination can occur through any surface the employee touches. Action items: (1) immediate exclusion, (2) notify the local enforcement agency without delay (required for Big 6 pathogen diagnoses), (3) cooperate with the contact-tracing investigation, (4) post-exposure prophylaxis (HAV vaccine or immune globulin) within 14 days for exposed coworkers and possibly customers, (5) return only with written medical release. Options A, B, and C all keep an HAV-positive worker on premises and are non-compliant; multiple major U.S. outbreaks (e.g., 2003 Chi-Chi's outbreak, 660 sickened, 4 dead) trace to ignoring this rule.
HSC §113949.2California Retail Food Code HSC §113949.1 lists STEC (Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, including the well-known serotype O157:H7) as a Big 6 reportable pathogen. The classic outbreak vehicle is undercooked GROUND BEEF — the 1993 Jack-in-the-Box outbreak (4 children died, 700+ sickened) drove the federal switch to mandatory 155°F cooking for ground beef. Cattle are the primary reservoir, with the organism present in their intestines and shed in feces; ground beef pools surface-contaminated trim from many animals, distributing surface bacteria into the geometric center of every patty. Other documented vehicles: raw leafy greens contaminated by cattle-feces runoff (multiple romaine outbreaks 2017-2020), unpasteurized milk and juice, raw flour, mechanically tenderized whole-muscle beef, and venison. Cooking control under HSC §114004 is 155°F for 17 seconds (or equivalent time-temperature combination) in the center of the ground product. Option A is wrong; pasteurized dairy is the SAFE product. Option C describes poultry/Salmonella controls. Option D describes a temperature combination that does not apply to STEC. STEC's hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is the leading cause of acute kidney failure in U.S. children.
HSC §113949.1California Retail Food Code HSC §113949.2 lists jaundice (icterus, yellowing of skin or sclera) as one of the conditions requiring IMMEDIATE EXCLUSION of the employee from the food facility and IMMEDIATE notification of the local enforcement agency. Jaundice is treated as presumed Hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection until medically proven otherwise — the rule applies if the onset was within the past 7 days (older jaundice is handled differently per FDA Food Code 2-201.12). Exclusion means the employee may not be on premises in ANY capacity. Return requires written clearance from the local health officer (typically after laboratory confirmation rules out HAV or, if HAV is confirmed, after the infectious period has ended, usually 7 days after onset of jaundice). The reason for the immediate, strict response is that HAV infectiousness peaks BEFORE jaundice appears — by the time jaundice is visible, the employee has likely been shedding virus for 1-2 weeks and any food they touched in that period is suspect. Options A, B, and D all keep a presumed-HAV employee in the facility and are dangerously non-compliant; the 2003 Chi-Chi's outbreak (>660 cases) traced to ignoring exactly this protocol.
HSC §113949.2California Retail Food Code HSC §113949.4 (adopting FDA Food Code 2-201.13) requires exclusion of a food employee who vomits at work for a MINIMUM of 24 hours symptom-free after the last vomiting episode, before return. Vomiting is treated as a high-suspicion event for Norovirus, which can be aerosolized in vomit droplets and spread over a wide radius (documented dispersal up to 25 feet). The 24-hour minimum is consistent with the exclusion requirement for diarrhea; many California enforcement agencies and corporate operators apply 48 hours as a safer interval because Norovirus shedding continues well after symptoms stop. In addition to exclusion, California Retail Food Code §114049 (vomit and fecal accident cleanup) requires the facility to have a WRITTEN procedure for: (a) safely cleaning the contamination using an EPA-registered Norovirus-effective product (typically chlorine at ≥1000 ppm, or an EPA List G product), (b) discarding food in the splash radius, (c) isolating and re-sanitizing the area, and (d) evaluating exposed staff. Options A, B, and C are all shorter than the 24-hour code minimum and are non-compliant.
HSC §113949.4Last reviewed: · editorial process
What's on the California Food Handler Card?
The California Food Handler Card is administered by the California Department of Public Health (ANSI-CFP accredited providers). Topic weights below come directly from the official exam blueprint — focus your study on the highest-weighted areas first.
Topic blueprint
- 25%Time & Temperature Control
- 18%Personal Hygiene
- 15%Cross-Contamination & Allergens
- 15%Cleaning & Sanitizing
- 12%Illness Reporting
- 10%California Rules
- 5%Pest Control
How hard is the exam?
Easy. The California Food Handler Card is an entry-level certification — about 40 multiple-choice questions, 1 hour, 75% to pass. Open-book in many provider implementations.
- Recommended study hours
- 1-3 hours of focused study is enough for most candidates
- First-attempt pass rate
- Approximately 85-90% first-attempt pass rate. Retakes are usually free with the same provider if you fail.
- Where to focus first
- Time & Temperature Control (cooking/cold-hold/danger-zone numbers) — most failing answers come from forgetting the specific temperature thresholds.
Figures (pass rates, fees, salaries) are approximate and can change — always verify with the official testing body or licensing board before you rely on them.
Frequently asked questions
How many California food handler practice questions are in this bank?+
239 original practice questions covering all 7 topics of the California Food Handler Card exam (ANSI-CFP accredited curriculum).
Is this food handler practice test free?+
Yes, free with no signup. Note: the actual California Food Handler Card costs around $7-$15 from an ANSI-CFP-accredited provider — PrepPass is a free study aid, not a card-issuing provider.
Will completing this give me a California Food Handler Card?+
No. To get the official Food Handler Card, you must pass an exam from an ANSI-CFP-accredited provider (StateFoodSafety, eFoodHandlers, ServSafe, Learn2Serve, AAA Food Handler, etc.). PrepPass helps you study; the registration guide page lists official providers.
What's on the California Food Handler exam?+
Seven topics from the California Retail Food Code: Personal Hygiene, Time & Temperature Control, Cross Contamination & Allergens, Cleaning & Sanitizing, Pest Control, Illness Reporting, and California-specific rules (CalCode §113700+).
What's the passing score for the food handler exam?+
Typically 75% (ANSI-CFP accreditation standard) — exact threshold depends on the provider you use for the official card exam. The exam itself is usually ~40 questions over ~1 hour, online or at the provider's facility.
Is the food handler exam available in Spanish, Chinese, or Vietnamese?+
Most major ANSI-CFP providers offer the official exam in Spanish; some offer Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean, and Tagalog. PrepPass practice questions are available in English, 中文, Español, and Tiếng Việt.
How long is a California Food Handler Card valid?+
3 years statewide (per California Health & Safety Code §113948). Riverside, San Bernardino, and San Diego counties have their own programs; the 3-year validity still applies. New restaurant employees must obtain the card within 30 days of hire.