Powers to ArrestQuestion 26 of 200

Which of the following best summarizes a key procedural difference between a peace-officer arrest and a private-person arrest?

a.A peace officer may arrest for a felony on probable cause even if no felony actually occurred; a private person bears the risk that no felony was 'in fact committed'
b.Peace officers must inform the arrestee of the charge before restraining them, while a private person making a citizen's arrest owes no such notice at all
c.Private persons may resort to deadly force as a first option because they have no backup, while peace officers must exhaust lesser alternatives first
d.Peace officers must obtain a warrant from a magistrate before every arrest unless the suspect is actively fleeing, while a private person may arrest without any warrant at all under §837

Explanation

The core procedural difference is the §837(3) 'in fact committed' requirement applied to private-person felony arrests, contrasted with the §836 probable-cause standard for peace officers. A peace officer acting reasonably is protected even if it later turns out no felony actually occurred; a private person is not. Both peace officers and private persons must give §841 notice (b is wrong). Deadly force authority is narrower, not broader, for private persons (c). Warrantless arrests are widely authorized for both categories under §§836 and 837 (d is wrong).

Law Reference: Cal. Penal Code §§836, 837; People v. Cervantez factor analysis

This topic, taught in full in the California Guard Card (BSIS Security Guard) guide. California Guard Card — Complete Study Guide (2026) — PDF + EPUB, $9.99 · 14-day refund →

Practice all 200 questions free — no signup required.

Own the complete California Guard Card (BSIS Security Guard) guide — PDF + EPUB, $9.99 →

Related questions on this topic

Last reviewed: · editorial process

PrepPass team · Verified against California BSIS Guard Card Exam · How we review
Report