In a security incident report, the distinction between 'factual' and 'subjective' statements means:
Explanation
Reports should be built on observable, verifiable facts: what the guard saw, heard, smelled, felt, did, and was told (and by whom). Subjective characterizations ('aggressive,' 'suspicious,' 'intoxicated') are opinions that should be supported by underlying facts ('slurred speech, swayed when standing, smelled of alcoholic beverage from a distance of two feet'). Subjective statements aren't always wrong (d), but unsupported conclusions weaken credibility and provide cross-examination targets. Tense (a) and length (b) are not the relevant distinction. Strong reports separate observation from inference and document the factual basis for any characterization.
Law Reference: Evidence Code §780 (witness credibility); BSIS report-writing curriculumPractice all 200 questions free — no signup required.
Related questions on this topic
- Why is contemporaneous note-taking (taking notes during or immediately after an event) so important for security guards?
- The 'Five W's and H' framework for incident reports captures:
- When organizing the body of an incident report describing a sequence of events, the most generally preferred structure is:
- Most PPOs and BSIS training materials recommend writing incident reports in:
- A guard photographs an incident scene for documentation. California's constitutional privacy right and Civil Code §1708.8 mean the guard should:
- California Penal Code §632 (California Invasion of Privacy Act) generally requires what before a security guard may lawfully audio-record a confidential conversation in California?
Last reviewed: · editorial process