Observation & ReportsQuestion 134 of 200
Compared to a fixed-route patrol, a randomized patrol pattern offers:
a.Reduced predictability — adversaries surveilling the site cannot reliably anticipate the guard's location, increasing deterrent and detection value, though randomization should still cover all critical checkpoints over the shift
b.Lower training requirements
c.Guaranteed lower cost
d.Automatic compliance with all legal requirements
Explanation
Routine fixed-route patrols are easy to surveil — an adversary watching the site can chart the guard's pattern and plan the breach for the longest gap. Randomized patrol patterns vary route, timing, and direction, defeating that intelligence. Critical: randomization is not abandonment of coverage; the guard should still hit every required checkpoint within the shift, just in unpredictable order. Many sites use guard-tour systems (RFID/NFC checkpoints) that record visits — these support coverage verification without revealing the route. Randomization doesn't reduce training (b), guarantee cost savings (c), or substitute for legal compliance (d).
Law Reference: Standard security patrol doctrinePractice all 200 questions free — no signup required.
Related questions on this topic
- When recording a suspect description for an incident report or BOLO, the most defensible approach is:
- A defensible vehicle description for an incident report should include:
- Which combination represents typical 'suspicious activity' indicators worth documenting?
- Cooper's Color Code (Condition White through Red) is a situational-awareness framework. For a guard on duty, the recommended baseline condition is:
- Pre-shift premise familiarization — knowing the geography of the assigned site — is important because:
- When monitoring a large crowd, anomaly-detection techniques focus on:
Last reviewed: · editorial process
PrepPass Editorial Team · Verified against California BSIS Guard Card Exam · How we review