Medicare & Senior InsuranceQuestion 244 of 315

A California producer recommends a 10-year deferred fixed annuity with a 9-year surrender-charge schedule to a 78-year-old client whose only liquid assets are needed for medical expenses within the next 2 years. Under California suitability rules, the recommendation is MOST likely:

a.Suitable, because deferred annuities offer tax deferral that benefits all seniors
b.Suitable, provided the senior signs a written acknowledgment that she understands the surrender schedule
c.Permissible only if the producer has completed 8 hours of annuity training
d.Unsuitable, because the surrender period exceeds the client's investment time horizon and impairs liquidity for known near-term needs

Explanation

California Insurance Code §10234.93 (and the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model adopted in California) requires the producer to have reasonable grounds to believe a recommended annuity is suitable in light of the consumer's age, financial situation, liquidity needs, financial objectives, intended use, time horizon, and existing assets. A 9-year surrender-charge schedule on a 78-year-old whose liquidity needs arise within 2 years fails the time-horizon and liquidity prongs — the surrender charges would erode principal exactly when needed. Option A wrongly assumes tax deferral is universally beneficial. Option B — a signed acknowledgment cannot cure a structurally unsuitable sale. Option C — annuity training (8 hours) is required, but completing it does not validate an unsuitable recommendation.

Law Reference: California Insurance Code §10234.93 (annuity suitability)

Practice all 315 questions free — no signup required.

Related questions on this topic

Last reviewed: · editorial process

PrepPass Editorial Team · Verified against California Life & Health Insurance License Exam · How we review
Report