Under California's prompt-payment statute for health insurance, an insurer must pay or contest a 'clean' claim within how many working days of receipt?
Explanation
California Insurance Code §10123.13 (and §10350.5 for disability/health) requires an insurer to reimburse or contest a clean claim from a contracted health provider within 30 working days of receipt for paper claims and 30 calendar days for electronic claims. If the insurer fails to act within that window, interest at 10% per year (or 15% for certain emergency claims under §10123.147) accrues automatically on the unpaid amount. Option A — too short; not the statutory rule. Option C (90 days) — closer to the federal Medicare standard, not the CA private-insurance rule. Option D is far beyond statute. The prompt-payment rules are part of California's consumer-protection regime that prevents insurers from indefinitely deferring legitimate provider claims.
Law Reference: Cal. Ins. Code §10350.5 (prompt payment of claims)Practice all 315 questions free — no signup required.
Related questions on this topic
- Which statement about pre-existing-condition exclusions is correct under current federal and California rules?
- Under the Time of Payment of Claims required provision, periodic disability income benefits that have accrued must be paid at least how often during the period the insurer is liable?
- Under HIPAA's portability rules as modified by the ACA, which statement is correct regarding pre-existing condition exclusions in group health plans?
- Under the required Grace Period provision in a California individual accident & health policy paid on a quarterly mode, the grace period is:
- Under federal COBRA, the maximum continuation period for a covered employee who becomes entitled to Medicare and the family then loses coverage is:
- Under HIPAA Title I as ORIGINALLY enacted, a 'pre-existing condition' for group-health-plan purposes was defined as a condition for which medical advice, diagnosis, care, or treatment was recommended or received during the:
Last reviewed: · editorial process