On the 'force continuum,' a security guard should escalate force based on:
Explanation
Reasonableness and proportionality govern force decisions. Modern continuum training teaches: presence, verbal commands, empty-hand control (soft and hard), less-lethal tools (OC, baton), and finally deadly force — each step justified only by the resistance/threat actually presented. Guards must avoid 'pre-escalation' and revert to lower-force options as resistance subsides. Bystander counts, demographics, or external pressures (b, c, d) are improper bases for force decisions and create civil and criminal exposure.
Law Reference: Cal. Penal Code §835; Common-law reasonable forceThis topic, taught in full in the California Guard Card (BSIS Security Guard) guide. California Guard Card — Complete Study Guide (2026) — PDF + EPUB, $9.99 · 14-day refund →
Practice all 200 questions free — no signup required.
Own the complete California Guard Card (BSIS Security Guard) guide — PDF + EPUB, $9.99 →
Related questions on this topic
- Under Penal Code §693, resistance by the party about to be injured may be made:
- Under Penal Code §694, lawful resistance by 'other parties' (defense of others) authorizes:
- May a private security guard use deadly force solely to protect property (e.g., merchandise or a vehicle)?
- Verbal de-escalation should generally be attempted:
- Once an arrestee is fully restrained (e.g., handcuffed and seated, no longer resisting), further use of force by the guard is:
- If a security guard uses excessive force on a person, which California criminal statutes most directly apply?
Last reviewed: · editorial process