An armed guard observes a person actively swinging a baseball bat at customers' heads inside the store. The guard's firearm may be used:
Explanation
California's deadly-force standard (PC §835a(c)(1); People v. Humphrey reasonable belief analysis; Graham v. Connor totality test) authorizes deadly force only on a reasonable belief of imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury. Active bat strikes to heads plainly create such a threat. Waiting for a fatal blow (b) is not required and would be tactically catastrophic. 'Shoot to wound' (c) is a training myth — firearms training is shoot center mass to stop a threat. Radio authorization (d) is not a legal prerequisite for self-defense.
Law Reference: Cal. Penal Code §835a(c)(1); People v. Humphrey (1996) 13 Cal.4th 1073This topic, taught in full in the California Guard Card (BSIS Security Guard) guide. California Guard Card — Complete Study Guide (2026) — PDF + EPUB, $9.99 · 14-day refund →
Practice all 200 questions free — no signup required.
Own the complete California Guard Card (BSIS Security Guard) guide — PDF + EPUB, $9.99 →
Related questions on this topic
- When may a guard lawfully deploy pepper spray (OC) against a non-compliant subject?
- A baton-permitted guard strikes a non-resisting handcuffed subject with the baton 'to make sure they cooperate later.' Legally, this is:
- Handcuffing a citizen-arrested subject who is calm and compliant is:
- A shoplifter steals a watch and runs out of the store unarmed. The guard cannot catch up. Deadly force on this fleeing suspect is:
- After any significant use of force, a security guard should:
- Under BSIS regulations and BPC §7583.39, the security company (licensee) generally must:
Last reviewed: · editorial process