Use of ForceQuestion 66 of 200
Handcuffing a citizen-arrested subject who is calm and compliant is:
a.Always required by BSIS
b.Always excessive force
c.Permissible if reasonably necessary to maintain safe custody pending police arrival, applying the §835 reasonable-restraint standard
d.Permitted only if the subject consents
Explanation
Handcuffing is a form of restraint authorized by §835's 'reasonable restraint' clause when reasonably necessary to maintain custody, prevent escape, or protect against unforeseen resistance. The decision is fact-specific: calm subjects may still require cuffing where escape risk or threat to others remains. Cuffs must be applied without excessive tightness and checked periodically. BSIS does not mandate cuffing in every arrest (a); cuffs are not categorically excessive (b); and consent (d) is not required for lawful restraint.
Law Reference: Cal. Penal Code §835; objective reasonablenessPractice all 200 questions free — no signup required.
Related questions on this topic
- If a security guard uses excessive force on a person, which California criminal statutes most directly apply?
- When may a guard lawfully deploy pepper spray (OC) against a non-compliant subject?
- A baton-permitted guard strikes a non-resisting handcuffed subject with the baton 'to make sure they cooperate later.' Legally, this is:
- An armed guard observes a person actively swinging a baseball bat at customers' heads inside the store. The guard's firearm may be used:
- A shoplifter steals a watch and runs out of the store unarmed. The guard cannot catch up. Deadly force on this fleeing suspect is:
- After any significant use of force, a security guard should:
Last reviewed: · editorial process
PrepPass Editorial Team · Verified against California BSIS Guard Card Exam · How we review