A shoplifter steals a watch and runs out of the store unarmed. The guard cannot catch up. Deadly force on this fleeing suspect is:
Explanation
Tennessee v. Garner squarely holds deadly force against an unarmed, non-violent fleeing suspect is unconstitutional. PC §835a(c)(1) codifies the principle for California peace officers, and the same standard applies civilly to private security. Property value (b), owner instruction (c), and the act of fleeing (d) cannot transform an unjustified deadly use of force into a lawful one. Deadly force on these facts would expose the guard to homicide charges (§§187, 192) and crushing civil liability.
Law Reference: Tennessee v. Garner (1985) 471 U.S. 1; Cal. Penal Code §835a(c)(1)This topic, taught in full in the California Guard Card (BSIS Security Guard) guide. California Guard Card — Complete Study Guide (2026) — PDF + EPUB, $9.99 · 14-day refund →
Practice all 200 questions free — no signup required.
Own the complete California Guard Card (BSIS Security Guard) guide — PDF + EPUB, $9.99 →
Related questions on this topic
- A baton-permitted guard strikes a non-resisting handcuffed subject with the baton 'to make sure they cooperate later.' Legally, this is:
- Handcuffing a citizen-arrested subject who is calm and compliant is:
- An armed guard observes a person actively swinging a baseball bat at customers' heads inside the store. The guard's firearm may be used:
- After any significant use of force, a security guard should:
- Under BSIS regulations and BPC §7583.39, the security company (licensee) generally must:
- A guard encounters a person who appears to be in mental health crisis (disoriented, talking to unseen persons, no clear threat). The appropriate response is generally:
Last reviewed: · editorial process