California's 'officer-created jeopardy' (or 'pre-shooting tactical') doctrine — recognized in Hayes v. County of San Diego (2013) 57 Cal.4th 622 — provides that:
Explanation
Hayes v. County of San Diego (2013) 57 Cal.4th 622 expressly rejected the federal 'final frame' approach for California negligence claims and held that an officer's pre-shooting tactical decisions are part of the totality of circumstances bearing on reasonableness. Aggressive tactics that needlessly create or escalate jeopardy can weigh against the reasonableness of subsequent force. The principle informs private-security practice — guards who needlessly escalate may find force decisions scrutinized in light of pre-force conduct. Options (a), (c), (d) misstate the rule.
Law Reference: Hayes v. County of San Diego (2013) 57 Cal.4th 622; Cal. Penal Code §835aThis topic, taught in full in the California Guard Card (BSIS Security Guard) guide. California Guard Card — Complete Study Guide (2026) — PDF + EPUB, $9.99 · 14-day refund →
Practice all 200 questions free — no signup required.
Own the complete California Guard Card (BSIS Security Guard) guide — PDF + EPUB, $9.99 →
Related questions on this topic
- After using force resulting in any apparent injury, the guard's medical-care duty is to:
- After deploying OC pepper spray on a subject, the guard should generally:
- The phrase 'reasonable belief' for use-of-force purposes most accurately means:
- Recognizing acute behavioral crisis (formerly often labeled "excited delirium") and adjusting response is now a recognized California training expectation because:
- Civil immunity for false arrest under California law extends most fully to:
- Synthesizing the chapter: which statement BEST summarizes a private security guard's use-of-force authority in California?
Last reviewed: · editorial process