Use of ForceQuestion 86 of 200
The phrase 'reasonable belief' for use-of-force purposes most accurately means:
a.A belief based on articulable facts and circumstances that a reasonable person in the actor's position would hold; both subjective sincerity and objective reasonableness are considered
b.A subjective hunch based on training
c.Any belief held by a state-certified guard
d.A guess, so long as it is documented in writing
Explanation
California self-defense and use-of-force jurisprudence (CALCRIM 505, §835a, Graham v. Connor) requires both that the actor sincerely held the belief AND that a reasonable person in the same circumstances would also have held it. Articulable facts — what the subject said, did, displayed, the surrounding environment — must support the belief. Options (b), (c), (d) wrongly reduce the standard to subjective intuition, training-status badges, or documentation alone.
Law Reference: PC §835a(c)(1); reasonable belief doctrine; Graham v. ConnorPractice all 200 questions free — no signup required.
Related questions on this topic
- When a force incident results in injury, the most legally protective documentation practice is to:
- After using force resulting in any apparent injury, the guard's medical-care duty is to:
- After deploying OC pepper spray on a subject, the guard should generally:
- Recognizing acute behavioral crisis (formerly often labeled "excited delirium") and adjusting response is now a recognized California training expectation because:
- California's 'officer-created jeopardy' (or 'pre-shooting tactical') doctrine — recognized in Hayes v. County of San Diego (2013) 57 Cal.4th 622 — provides that:
- Civil immunity for false arrest under California law extends most fully to:
Last reviewed: · editorial process
PrepPass Editorial Team · Verified against California BSIS Guard Card Exam · How we review