Following a covered collision repair, a California insured argues that her car is now worth less on resale than before the accident because of its accident history. With respect to first-party diminished value (the loss of resale value) claimed against the insured's own physical damage carrier, California generally:
Explanation
California courts have generally held that, where an insurer pays to properly repair the vehicle to its pre-loss condition, the insurer's contract duty is satisfied; the standard PAP does not separately require the insurer to pay diminished value. Diminished value is more often pursued from the at-fault driver in a third-party claim. Some jurisdictions handle this differently, but California first-party physical damage claims generally do not include diminished value.
Law Reference: California common law on first-party diminished valueThis topic, taught in full in the California Property & Casualty Broker-Agent guide. California Property & Casualty Broker-Agent Study Guide — 2026 Edition — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 · 14-day refund →
Practice all 531 questions free — no signup required.
Own the complete California Property & Casualty Broker-Agent guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →
Related questions on this topic
- Which of the following losses is specifically EXCLUDED under Part A Liability of the Personal Auto Policy?
- California Underinsured Motorist (UIM) coverage applies when:
- An insured drives her covered Honda to a dealer to test-drive a new SUV. While on the test drive she damages the SUV in a collision. Under the Personal Auto Policy, the SUV is best treated as:
- California considers a vehicle to be a 'total loss salvage vehicle' for title-branding purposes when:
- Under Part A of the Personal Auto Policy, the term 'bodily injury' includes which of the following damages a plaintiff may recover?
- Which statement comparing the ISO Personal Auto Policy (PAP) and the Business Auto Coverage Form (BACF) is MOST accurate?
Last reviewed: · editorial process