Nebraska Real Estate Salesperson Exam — All Questions
50 questions
Which of the following is NOT one of the essential elements required for a valid contract?
- a.Consideration
- b.Legal capacity of the parties
- c.Offer and acceptance (mutual assent)
- d.Notarization of the parties' signatures✓
A valid contract requires mutual assent (offer and acceptance), consideration, legal capacity of the parties, lawful object, and (for real estate) usually a writing. Notarization is not an element of validity; it is only an authentication used for recording certain documents such as deeds. The other three choices are all genuine essential elements.
A seller receives an offer and responds by changing the closing date and raising the price before signing. This response is legally best described as a:
- a.Novation
- b.Counteroffer✓
- c.Option
- d.Valid acceptance
Any change to the material terms of an offer is a counteroffer, which rejects the original offer and creates a new offer that the other party may accept or reject. It is not an acceptance because acceptance must mirror the offer exactly. An option is a separate contract giving a right to buy within a set time. A novation is the substitution of a new contract or party for an existing one.
The legal doctrine that requires contracts for the sale of real estate to be in writing to be enforceable is called the:
- a.Statute of limitations
- b.Doctrine of laches
- c.Parol evidence rule
- d.Statute of frauds✓
The statute of frauds requires certain contracts, including those for the sale of real property, to be in writing and signed to be enforceable. The statute of limitations sets the time limit for filing a lawsuit. Laches bars a claim due to unreasonable delay that prejudices the other party. The parol evidence rule limits the use of outside evidence to contradict a written contract.
A buyer and seller sign a purchase agreement, but before closing the seller changes his mind and refuses to convey title. The buyer sues to force the seller to complete the sale. The buyer is seeking:
- a.Rescission
- b.A novation
- c.Specific performance✓
- d.Liquidated damages
Specific performance is an equitable remedy that compels a party to carry out the contract as agreed; it is available in real estate because each parcel of land is considered unique and money damages may be inadequate. Liquidated damages are a pre-agreed money amount for a breach. Rescission cancels the contract and returns the parties to their prior positions. A novation replaces the contract, which is not what the buyer wants.
A contract signed by a 15-year-old minor to purchase real estate is generally considered:
- a.Void from the start
- b.Fully enforceable against both parties
- c.Voidable by the minor✓
- d.Illegal
A contract made by a minor is voidable at the minor's option because minors lack full legal capacity; the minor may disaffirm it, but the adult party is bound unless the minor chooses to cancel. It is not void from the start (that describes contracts with an illegal purpose or missing an essential element), it is not fully enforceable against the minor, and buying real estate is a lawful object, so it is not illegal.
An open listing in which the seller promises to pay a commission only if a broker produces a buyer, with no broker obligated to act, is an example of:
- a.a bilateral contract
- b.a fully executed contract
- c.a unilateral contract✓
- d.a voidable contract
A unilateral contract is a promise exchanged for an act - only one party (the seller) is bound unless and until another performs. A bilateral contract has promises on both sides, an executed contract is fully performed, and a voidable one can be canceled by a party.
A purchase agreement has been signed by both parties, but closing has not yet occurred. This contract is best described as:
- a.a unilateral contract
- b.a void contract
- c.an executory contract✓
- d.a fully executed contract
An executory contract is signed but not yet fully performed - obligations remain because closing is still pending. Once all parties complete performance at closing, it becomes executed. It is neither void nor unilateral here.
A purchase contract states that if the buyer defaults, the seller keeps the earnest money as full compensation. This provision is an example of:
- a.a novation
- b.liquidated damages✓
- c.specific performance
- d.an option payment
Liquidated damages are a pre-agreed amount the parties set as the remedy for a breach; forfeited earnest money commonly serves this role and limits the seller to that sum. Specific performance forces completion, an option pays for a right to buy, and novation replaces a contract.
A clause stating that 'time is of the essence' means:
- a.the time limits are only suggestions
- b.the stated deadlines must be met exactly or a party is in default✓
- c.the contract no longer needs to specify any fixed closing date at all
- d.either party may freely extend any deadline
'Time is of the essence' makes the stated deadlines strictly binding, so missing a date is a breach that can end the contract. Without such a clause, courts may allow a reasonable delay. It does not make dates flexible or optional.
A financing contingency in a purchase contract:
- a.guarantees that the seller will receive a full-price, all-cash offer to buy
- b.requires the buyer to complete the purchase with cash
- c.obligates the seller to finance the buyer
- d.lets the buyer cancel and recover the deposit if the loan is not obtained✓
A contingency is a condition that must be met for the contract to proceed; a financing contingency lets the buyer void the deal and reclaim earnest money if they cannot obtain the specified loan. It does not force cash, obligate the seller to lend, or guarantee price.
Assigning a contract means:
- a.canceling the contract entirely and returning the earnest deposit
- b.forfeiting the earnest money to the seller
- c.transferring one's rights under the contract to another party✓
- d.substituting a brand-new contract for the old
Assignment transfers a party's rights (and often duties) under an existing contract to a third party, who steps into that position; most real estate contracts are assignable unless prohibited. Substituting a new contract or party is novation, not assignment.
Novation occurs when:
- a.a contract has been signed by all parties but has not yet been performed or closed at all
- b.earnest money is deposited into escrow
- c.a party transfers only its rights to another
- d.the parties replace the old contract or a party with a new one, releasing the original✓
Novation substitutes a new contract or a new party for the original, with the original obligation extinguished and the prior party released. It differs from assignment, where the original party can remain liable.
A contract whose purpose is to accomplish something illegal is:
- a.voidable
- b.void✓
- c.valid but merely unenforceable
- d.enforceable once it is put in writing
A contract with an unlawful object is void - it has no legal effect from the start and cannot be enforced by anyone. A voidable contract is valid until a party cancels it, and an illegal purpose cannot be cured by putting it in writing.
An oral agreement to sell a parcel of land is best described as:
- a.unenforceable under the statute of frauds✓
- b.automatically void from the very beginning and start
- c.illegal and therefore criminal
- d.fully enforceable by either party
The statute of frauds requires real estate sale contracts to be in writing; an oral one is generally unenforceable in court even though it is otherwise valid between the parties. It is not void or illegal - just not enforceable.
In an option to purchase, the optionee:
- a.is the party who currently owns the property
- b.has the right, but not the obligation, to buy within a set time✓
- c.automatically receives a commission at closing
- d.is legally required to purchase the property by the stated deadline
An option gives the optionee, for consideration, the right - but not the duty - to buy on set terms within a fixed period; the optionor (owner) must sell if the optionee exercises. The optionee is not obligated to purchase.
The primary purpose of earnest money is to:
- a.pay the listing broker's full sales commission in advance
- b.satisfy the entire down payment amount
- c.transfer legal title to the buyer at signing
- d.show the buyer's good-faith commitment to the purchase✓
Earnest money is a good-faith deposit showing the buyer is serious; it is typically held in trust and applied to the purchase at closing. It is not the broker's commission, is usually only part of the down payment, and does not transfer title.
When a buyer wrongfully backs out of a signed purchase contract, one common remedy available to the seller is to:
- a.pay the defaulting buyer for their moving and relocation damages in full
- b.automatically waive the sales commission owed
- c.rescind the contract and, if the terms allow, keep the earnest money✓
- d.convey title to the buyer anyway
On a buyer's breach the seller may cancel (rescind) and typically retain the earnest money as liquidated damages, sue for actual damages, or seek specific performance. The seller does not owe the defaulting buyer damages or have to convey title.
The statute of frauds requires that a contract for the sale of real estate be:
- a.filed with the county recorder to be valid
- b.in writing and signed to be enforceable✓
- c.approved in advance by a judge
- d.notarized by the buyer before closing
The statute of frauds requires that contracts for the sale of real estate (and certain others) be in writing and signed to be enforceable. Recording, notarization, and court approval are not what the statute demands for enforceability.
For a real estate contract to be valid, the parties must be:
- a.licensed real estate agents
- b.represented at all times by their own private attorneys
- c.of legal age and sound mind (legally competent)✓
- d.residents of the same state
Legal capacity requires parties who are of legal age and mentally competent; contracts with minors or mentally incapacitated persons are voidable or void. Parties need not have attorneys, hold licenses, or share a state of residence.
Mutual assent, sometimes called a 'meeting of the minds,' is shown by:
- a.the recording of the signed deed in the records
- b.the payment of the property taxes
- c.a valid offer and an unqualified acceptance✓
- d.the completion of a boundary survey
Mutual assent - offer and acceptance - is the agreement element of a valid contract, and the acceptance must mirror the offer's terms. Recording, taxes, and surveys relate to the transaction, not to the formation of agreement.
Consideration, as a required element of a contract, refers to:
- a.the broker's agreed-upon sales commission percentage rate
- b.the seller's original asking price
- c.something of legal value exchanged by the parties✓
- d.the appraised value of the home
Consideration is something of legal value (money, a promise, or an act) that each party gives, and it supports the bargain. It is a required element and is distinct from the commission, the appraised value, or the list price.
If the person who made an ordinary offer dies before the other party accepts it, the offer:
- a.terminates automatically✓
- b.becomes an option contract
- c.converts into a binding contract
- d.must still be accepted by the offeror's heirs
An unaccepted offer is personal and terminates on the death or incapacity of either party before acceptance, so there is no contract to bind the estate. It does not automatically become binding or turn into an option.
When a seller responds to an offer with a counteroffer, the original offer is:
- a.converted into an option contract
- b.automatically binding on both parties
- c.rejected, so it can no longer be accepted✓
- d.still open for the buyer to accept it later
A counteroffer rejects and terminates the original offer, replacing it with a new one, so the buyer can no longer 'go back' and accept the first offer unless the seller re-extends it. It does not create automatic binding or an option.
In an installment land contract, during the payment period:
- a.the buyer receives full legal title to the property immediately
- b.a third-party lender holds title in trust
- c.the county holds title until it is paid
- d.the seller keeps legal title while the buyer takes possession✓
In a land (installment) contract, the buyer takes possession and equitable title and makes payments, while the seller retains legal title until the balance is paid. It is a seller-financing device; no third-party lender or county holds title.
Under an exclusive-right-to-sell listing, the broker earns a commission if the property sells during the listing term:
- a.only if the listing broker personally finds the buyer
- b.no matter who procures the buyer, even the owner✓
- c.only if the seller personally finds the buyer
- d.only if a cooperating broker finds the buyer
An exclusive right to sell entitles the listing broker to a commission if the property sells during the listing period regardless of who procures the buyer - even the owner. Under exclusive agency, by contrast, an owner who sells it personally owes no commission.
In an open listing:
- a.the seller may use several brokers and pays only the one who sells✓
- b.the seller cannot sell it personally
- c.only one single broker is authorized to market the property at a time
- d.the first broker to sign is always paid
An open (non-exclusive) listing lets the seller engage several brokers at once and pay only the broker who actually produces the buyer; the seller may also sell it personally with no commission. It is unilateral and non-exclusive.
Once a buyer removes (waives) an inspection contingency, the buyer:
- a.shifts the risk of the condition to the seller
- b.automatically extends the scheduled closing date
- c.generally loses the right to cancel for that reason and risks the deposit✓
- d.may still cancel the contract for any reason whatsoever at essentially any time
Removing a contingency signals the buyer's satisfaction with that condition; afterward the buyer usually cannot back out on that ground without breaching and risking the earnest money. It does not extend closing or shift risk to the seller.
The parol evidence rule generally prevents a party from:
- a.using prior oral statements to contradict a complete written contract✓
- b.recording a deed of trust in the records
- c.signing a real estate contract using an electronic or digital signature
- d.assigning contract rights to a third party
The parol evidence rule bars earlier oral or written statements from being used to contradict or vary the terms of a final, integrated written contract, protecting the reliability of the writing. It is unrelated to e-signatures, recording, or assignment.
The assignment of a contract generally means that:
- a.One party transfers its rights and often its duties to a third party✓
- b.A brand-new contract entirely replaces the old one and releases every original party from it
- c.A court reviews the agreement and formally declares the entire contract void and of no effect
- d.Both of the original parties mutually agree to cancel the contract and walk away from it
An assignment transfers a party's rights and interests in a contract to a third party (the assignee). Unless the other party agrees to release the original party, the assignor often remains secondarily liable. Replacing the contract and releasing the original party is a novation, not an assignment.
Novation differs from a simple assignment because novation:
- a.Cancels the existing contract entirely and puts no replacement agreement in its place at all
- b.Only transfers the contract rights while leaving the original party fully and primarily liable
- c.Substitutes a new party or contract and releases the original party✓
- d.Is required to be made orally between the parties and can never be reduced to a signed writing
In a novation, all parties agree to replace an original party (or the whole contract) with a new one, and the original obligor is released from further liability. A plain assignment transfers rights but usually leaves the assignor secondarily liable, which is the key distinction.
Under the statute of frauds, which of the following must generally be in writing to be enforceable?
- a.A lease for a term longer than one year✓
- b.A month-to-month oral rental agreement between a residential landlord and a tenant
- c.A verbal promise to split a commission that both parties have already fully performed
- d.A casual handshake agreement to paint a neighbor's backyard fence sometime next week
The statute of frauds requires contracts that cannot be performed within one year, and interests in real estate such as long-term leases, to be in writing. Short-term and month-to-month tenancies typically fall outside it, and everyday service agreements performable within a year need not be written.
In a purchase contract, earnest money is best understood as:
- a.A good-faith deposit showing serious intent, not required for validity✓
- b.The consideration without which no real estate contract could ever legally come into existence
- c.A payment that is always nonrefundable and that the seller keeps under every possible outcome
- d.A fee that the buyer must pay to the county recorder in order to have the deed put on record
Earnest money demonstrates the buyer's good faith and can become part of the down payment, but a contract is valid without it because the parties' mutual promises supply the consideration. Whether the seller may keep it on a buyer default depends on the contract terms, not an automatic forfeiture.
A liquidated damages clause in a real estate contract:
- a.Automatically voids the entire contract the moment either party is late on any deadline whatsoever
- b.Fixes in advance the amount payable on a breach, avoiding proof of actual loss✓
- c.Permits the injured party to recover unlimited punitive damages for even a minor or technical breach
- d.Requires the breaching party to specifically complete the sale and convey the property as agreed
Liquidated damages fix a reasonable, agreed-upon sum (often the earnest money) payable on breach, sparing the parties from litigating actual losses. It is not specific performance (which compels completion) and cannot be a penalty; grossly excessive amounts may be unenforceable.
When a contract states that 'time is of the essence,' it means:
- a.Only the seller, and never the buyer, is actually bound by the dates written into the agreement
- b.The parties may perform their obligations whenever it happens to be convenient for each of them
- c.The contract deliberately leaves the closing date open and unspecified for later determination
- d.Missing a stated deadline is itself a material breach of the contract✓
A 'time is of the essence' clause makes each specified date a strict, material term, so a party who misses a deadline is in breach and the other party may cancel or seek remedies. Without such a clause, courts may allow a reasonable extension for performance.
A financing contingency in a purchase agreement primarily protects the buyer by:
- a.Obligating the seller to personally provide the financing that the buyer was unable to obtain
- b.Requiring the buyer to come up with the full purchase price in cash if the mortgage is denied
- c.Letting the buyer cancel and usually recover the earnest money if the loan falls through✓
- d.Guaranteeing that the buyer will be approved for a mortgage from the chosen lending institution
A financing (mortgage) contingency lets the buyer back out without penalty, usually with the earnest money returned, if they are unable to secure the loan described in the contract by the deadline. It is a condition that must be satisfied for the buyer to be obligated to close.
An option to purchase real estate is best described as a:
- a.An agreement that immediately and automatically transfers legal title the moment it is signed
- b.A listing agreement between a property seller and the real estate broker hired to market it
- c.Unilateral contract binding the seller to sell if the optionee chooses to buy✓
- d.A bilateral contract that obligates both the buyer and the seller to complete the sale of the land
In an option, the optionor (seller) is bound to sell for the agreed price during the option period, but the optionee (buyer) has only the right, not the obligation, to buy, making it unilateral until exercised. Consideration paid for the option keeps it open.
A contract in which some acts still remain to be performed by one or both parties is classified as:
- a.Executory✓
- b.Unenforceable, meaning it was valid but cannot be enforced through the court system
- c.Executed, meaning every party has already fully carried out all of its promised obligations
- d.Void, meaning it never had any legal effect at all because it lacked an essential element
An executory contract is one still awaiting performance, such as a signed purchase agreement before closing. Once all parties have fully performed (for example, after closing and delivery of the deed), the contract is executed. Void and unenforceable describe validity, not the stage of performance.
A contract signed because of one party's intentional misrepresentation of a material fact (fraud) is generally:
- a.Automatically void from the very beginning, exactly as if it had never been formed at all
- b.Voidable at the option of the innocent, injured party✓
- c.Enforceable only after the document has been formally notarized and placed on public record
- d.Fully enforceable against the defrauded party despite the deception that induced the signing
Fraud (an intentional material misrepresentation relied upon to another's detriment) makes a contract voidable at the option of the innocent party, who may rescind or affirm it. It is not automatically void, and the wrongdoer cannot enforce it against the victim.
The parol evidence rule generally provides that:
- a.A signed written contract can never afterward be amended, changed, or supplemented in any way
- b.Every contract must be witnessed and signed in front of a notary public to be given any effect
- c.A prior oral agreement cannot contradict a complete, final written contract✓
- d.All oral contracts are automatically unenforceable no matter what their subject matter may be
The parol evidence rule bars using earlier oral or written statements to contradict or vary the terms of a final, integrated written contract. It promotes reliance on the written document; the parties can still amend the contract in a later signed writing.
Which of the following would discharge (terminate) a contract by operation of law rather than by the parties' own choice?
- a.One party choosing to assign its rights under the contract over to an unrelated third party
- b.Bankruptcy of a party or expiration of the statute of limitations✓
- c.Both parties simply completing full performance of everything the contract required of them
- d.The two parties mutually and voluntarily agreeing between themselves to rescind the contract
Discharge by operation of law includes events such as bankruptcy, illegality arising after formation, or the running of the statute of limitations. Mutual rescission, assignment, and full performance are ways the PARTIES end a contract, not automatic operation of law.
Showing 40 of 50