Business & LicensingQuestion 430 of 1632

One person serves as the qualifying individual for an existing licensed company. That same person now wants to also qualify a second, separate company. Under California law, this is:

a.Never permitted, whatever the relationship between the firms
b.Automatically permitted, for any number of separate companies
c.Permitted only where the second company does residential work
d.Permitted only where the firms are related, as §7068.1 defines

Explanation

§7068(e) sets the default: a person qualifying on behalf of a firm may not hold any other active contractor's licence while acting as its qualifying individual, except in accordance with §7068.1. §7068.1(a) lists the three relationships that open the door — common ownership of at least 20 percent of the equity of each firm, the additional firm being a subsidiary of or a joint venture with the first, or the same majority of the partners, officers or managers — and §7068.1(b) caps the whole arrangement at three firms in any one-year period. §7083(a) is where the board comes in: the exemption to qualify multiple licences under §7068.1 is information recorded on the licence, and any change to it must be reported in writing within 90 days. So (a) is too absolute, (b) ignores both the relationship test and the cap, and (c) invents a residential condition. Violating the section is a misdemeanour under §7068.1(e), with a fine of $3,000 to $5,000.

Law Reference: Bus. & Prof. Code §7068(e); §7068.1(a)-(b), (e); §7083(a)

This topic, taught in full in the CSLB Law & Business guide. CSLB Law & Business — Complete Study Guide (2026) — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 · 14-day refund →

Practice all 1632 questions free — no signup required.

Own the complete CSLB Law & Business guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →

Related questions on this topic

Last reviewed: · editorial process

PrepPass team · Verified against California CSLB Contractor License Law & Business Exam · How we review
Reviewed by Abraham Chen — Licensed California General Contractor (CSLB License #1101856 — verify)
Report