On a public works project, a subcontractor who has stopped work serves a stop payment notice on the public entity. The notice must generally be served:
Explanation
Civil Code §9356 sets two windows and only two: 30 days after a notice of completion, acceptance or cessation is recorded, or, if none is recorded, 90 days after completion or cessation. Recording such a notice shortens the period; it never leaves the 90-day branch in place, which is why the second option is the trap. Waiting for formal acceptance can push the claimant past the deadline, and acceptance is itself one of the events that starts the 30-day clock. There is no open-ended right: once the window closes the public entity has no duty to withhold, and §9558 separately cuts off suit on the payment bond six months after the stop-notice period ends.
Law Reference: Civil Code §9356; §9558This topic, taught in full in the CSLB Law & Business guide. CSLB Law & Business — Complete Study Guide (2026) — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 · 14-day refund →
Practice all 1632 questions free — no signup required.
Own the complete CSLB Law & Business guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →
Related questions on this topic
- A general contractor on a public works job pays a laborer the basic hourly rate in cash but provides NO health, pension, or training contributions. To comply with the prevailing wage determination, the contractor must:
- Which type of insurance coverage is a contractor required to carry for its employees on a California public works project, just as on private jobs?
- A contractor on a public works project knowingly fails to employ apprentices in the required ratio. The most likely consequence is:
- The payment bond required on a public works contract over $25,000 must be issued by:
- Which prevailing wage determination applies to the workers on a public works project?
- Within how many days after award of a public works contract must the awarding body provide a project notice (DIR PWC-100 filing) identifying the project to the Department of Industrial Relations?
Last reviewed: · editorial process