Contracts & ExecutionQuestion 800 of 1605

A contractor already under contract to frame a house for $40,000 demands an extra $5,000 midway through, claiming the job is 'harder than expected,' but the scope has not changed. If the owner reluctantly agrees, the promise to pay the extra $5,000 is generally:

a.Unenforceable under the pre-existing duty rule because the contractor gave no new consideration
b.Automatically a valid change order
c.Enforceable only if the extra is under 20% of the price
d.Fully enforceable because the owner agreed

Explanation

The pre-existing duty rule holds that a promise to do something a party is already contractually bound to do is not valid consideration. Because the framer was already obligated to complete the framing for $40,000 and the scope did not change, the owner's promise to pay an additional $5,000 lacks new consideration and is generally unenforceable. A genuine change order requires a real change in scope or a new bargained-for exchange.

Practice all 1605 questions free — no signup required.

Related questions on this topic

Last reviewed: · editorial process

Sen Lin, PrepPass Founder · Verified against California CSLB Contractor License Law & Business Exam · How we review
Reviewed by Abraham Chen Licensed California General Contractor (CSLB License #1101856 verify)
Report