Which of the following BEST describes the difference between tort liability and contract liability?
Explanation
A TORT is a civil wrong arising from the breach of a duty IMPOSED BY LAW for the protection of others (e.g., the duty of reasonable care). A CONTRACT obligation arises from a duty the parties have VOLUNTARILY UNDERTAKEN by their agreement. The same facts can sometimes give rise to both (a doctor's malpractice can be both a tort and breach of contract), but the distinction in source of duty is fundamental.
Law Reference: Tort vs. contract liability principlesThis topic, taught in full in the California Property & Casualty Broker-Agent guide. California Property & Casualty Broker-Agent Study Guide — 2026 Edition — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 · 14-day refund →
Practice all 531 questions free — no signup required.
Own the complete California Property & Casualty Broker-Agent guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →
Related questions on this topic
- Under California's Dram Shop law, a bar that sells alcohol to an OBVIOUSLY INTOXICATED MINOR who then causes a fatal car crash:
- California Insurance Code §11580 requires every liability policy issued or delivered in California to include a clause that:
- A California resident slips and breaks her arm on June 1, 2024. She does not file her personal injury lawsuit until July 1, 2026. Under California's statute of limitations, the lawsuit will MOST LIKELY be:
- A bar owner intentionally punches a customer during an argument and is sued for battery. The bar owner submits the claim under his CGL policy. The insurer will MOST LIKELY:
- A spectator at a baseball game is struck by a foul ball and sues the stadium. Under California law, which defense is the stadium MOST LIKELY to assert?
- The failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise under similar circumstances is the legal definition of:
Last reviewed: · editorial process