Casualty & LiabilityQuestion 93 of 215
A bar owner intentionally punches a customer during an argument and is sued for battery. The bar owner submits the claim under his CGL policy. The insurer will MOST LIKELY:
a.Pay the claim, because every CGL covers any bodily injury
b.Deny the claim under the 'Expected or Intended Injury' exclusion in Coverage A
c.Pay under Coverage C – Medical Payments only
d.Pay because intentional torts are still negligence
Explanation
CGL Coverage A excludes bodily injury or property damage 'expected or intended from the standpoint of the insured.' Intentional torts such as battery, assault, and trespass are precisely what this exclusion targets. (Some exceptions exist, such as reasonable force to protect persons or property.) The insurer would owe no defense or indemnity for the deliberate punch.
Law Reference: ISO CGL exclusions – Expected or Intended InjuryPractice all 215 questions free — no signup required.
Related questions on this topic
- Which statement BEST distinguishes a commercial umbrella policy from a true excess liability policy?
- Under California's Dram Shop law, a bar that sells alcohol to an OBVIOUSLY INTOXICATED MINOR who then causes a fatal car crash:
- California Insurance Code §11580 requires every liability policy issued or delivered in California to include a clause that:
- A California resident slips and breaks her arm on June 1, 2024. She does not file her personal injury lawsuit until July 1, 2026. Under California's statute of limitations, the lawsuit will MOST LIKELY be:
- Which of the following BEST describes the difference between tort liability and contract liability?
- A spectator at a baseball game is struck by a foul ball and sues the stadium. Under California law, which defense is the stadium MOST LIKELY to assert?
Last reviewed: · editorial process
PrepPass Editorial Team · Verified against California Property & Casualty Insurance License Exam · How we review