A patron who has been refused service complains loudly and demands to speak to the manager. The server should:
Explanation
Managers should always be involved in disputed refusals. The server briefs the manager privately, with a concise factual recap of the SCAN signs observed (slurred speech, swaying, glassy eyes, etc.), and the manager either reinforces the refusal directly to the patron or takes over the conversation entirely. The refusal itself does not reverse — §25602 still applies and the patron remains cut off for the night. Refusing to escalate to a manager (b) is unprofessional and leaves the server isolated; reversing the refusal for peace (a) violates the law and rewards pressure; threatening police (d) is premature unless the patron becomes a safety threat.
Law Reference: RBS Training CurriculumThis topic, taught in full in the California RBS (Responsible Beverage Service) guide. California RBS — Responsible Beverage Service Study Guide (2026) — PDF + EPUB, $9.99 · 14-day refund →
Practice all 100 questions free — no signup required.
Own the complete California RBS (Responsible Beverage Service) guide — PDF + EPUB, $9.99 →
Related questions on this topic
- Another patron offers to 'buy a drink' for someone who has just been cut off for intoxication. May the server lawfully serve the buy-back drink?
- A clearly intoxicated patron asks the server to call them 'just one Uber' and refuses to wait inside. The server should:
- A regular customer who tips well says, 'Come on, you know me — just one more.' The server should:
- An intoxicated patron threatens the server with physical violence after being refused. The server's priority order should be:
- Which of the following is a 'best practice' alternative to alcohol that a server can offer a cut-off patron?
- Which of the following statements about refusing alcohol service is TRUE?
Last reviewed: · editorial process