Civil & Criminal LiabilityQuestion 90 of 100

Even though California generally does not impose dram-shop liability for serving obviously intoxicated ADULTS, why should an RBS-certified server still strictly enforce §25602 refusals on adult patrons?

a.Because §25602 is a criminal misdemeanor exposing the individual server to prosecution, the licensee to ABC discipline and license loss, and the establishment to ordinary negligence claims and reputational harm
b.Because dram-shop liability secretly does apply to all adult cases
c.Because every refusal earns a state cash bonus
d.Because §25602 only applies to bartenders, not servers

Explanation

Even without §25602.1 civil exposure for adult patrons, the criminal misdemeanor (§25602), ABC license discipline (§24200), and general negligence claims (e.g., 'negligent oversight,' premises liability where the intoxicated patron assaults another guest) all remain. Establishments routinely lose lawsuits and licenses over §25602 violations. There is no cash bonus (c), and §25602 applies to anyone who sells, furnishes, or gives the alcohol (d).

Law Reference: Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §25602, §25602.1; RBS Curriculum

Practice all 100 questions free — no signup required.

Related questions on this topic

Last reviewed: · editorial process

PrepPass Editorial Team · Verified against California RBS Alcohol Server Exam · How we review
Report