Penal Code §647(j) prohibits which conduct relevant to video surveillance?
Explanation
PC §647(j) criminalizes invasive surveillance — including peeping into rooms where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy (changing rooms, restrooms, bedrooms, fitting rooms, tanning booths), photographing under or through clothing, and using devices to record private activity. Violations are misdemeanors with significant penalties; some forms also support civil claims under Civil Code §1708.8. Camera placement must respect privacy norms — covering restroom interiors or changing rooms with video is a felony-adjacent boundary. Cameras in genuinely public areas (a), retail floor surveillance (b), and office body-worn cameras (c) are not the §647(j) target.
Law Reference: Cal. Penal Code §647(j)This topic, taught in full in the California Guard Card (BSIS Security Guard) guide. California Guard Card — Complete Study Guide (2026) — PDF + EPUB, $9.99 · 14-day refund →
Practice all 200 questions free — no signup required.
Own the complete California Guard Card (BSIS Security Guard) guide — PDF + EPUB, $9.99 →
Related questions on this topic
- Most PPOs and BSIS training materials recommend writing incident reports in:
- A guard photographs an incident scene for documentation. California's constitutional privacy right and Civil Code §1708.8 mean the guard should:
- California Penal Code §632 (California Invasion of Privacy Act) generally requires what before a security guard may lawfully audio-record a confidential conversation in California?
- A guard is served with a civil subpoena to testify at deposition or trial about an observed incident. The guard should:
- When interviewing a witness to an incident, the most reliable question style for eliciting accurate information is:
- When recording a suspect description for an incident report or BOLO, the most defensible approach is:
Last reviewed: · editorial process