SafetyQuestion 1629 of 1632

A contractor with six employees brings a new solvent into the yard in March, has an outside safety consultant walk the site in June, and is told in September of a hazard nobody had recognised before. Which of these events triggered an IIPP hazard inspection duty?

a.Only the consultant's June visit, which is the annual inspection the IIPP standard requires
b.None of them, because an employer with fewer than ten employees is exempt from the standard
c.The new solvent in March and the newly recognised hazard in September, but not the June visit
d.All three of them, because §3203 requires an inspection whenever anything at all changes on site

Explanation

Section 3203(a)(4) names the triggers as events, not as a date on the calendar: when the programme is first established, whenever a new substance, process, procedure or equipment is introduced that represents a new occupational safety and health hazard, and whenever the employer is made aware of a new or previously unrecognised hazard, alongside scheduled periodic inspections. The March solvent and the September hazard are two of those triggers. A consultant's visit satisfies none of them by itself. There is no small-employer exemption from having and running a written programme; fewer than ten employees only changes how long inspection records must be kept.

Law Reference: Title 8 CCR §3203(a)(4), (b)(1)

This topic, taught in full in the CSLB Law & Business guide. CSLB Law & Business — Complete Study Guide (2026) — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 · 14-day refund →

Practice all 1632 questions free — no signup required.

Own the complete CSLB Law & Business guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →

Related questions on this topic

Last reviewed: · editorial process

PrepPass team · Verified against California CSLB Contractor License Law & Business Exam · How we review
Reviewed by Abraham Chen — Licensed California General Contractor (CSLB License #1101856 — verify)
Report