An employee works Monday through Saturday, 8 hours each day, for a total of 48 hours in the workweek with no single day exceeding 8 hours. How many hours qualify for overtime?
Explanation
Labor Code §510 gives California both daily and weekly overtime. No day passed 8 hours, so no daily overtime accrues, but 48 hours worked means 8 hours over the 40-hour weekly line, payable at 1.5x. (a) applies the double-time multiplier, which §510 reserves for hours past 12 in a day or past 8 on the seventh consecutive day. (c) is the common belief that California abolished weekly overtime once it adopted the daily rule; both rules operate. (d) counts the entire sixth day as overtime, which would be correct only if the sixth day were the seventh consecutive day of the workweek. An employer applies whichever rule pays more but may not pyramid the two on the same hours.
Law Reference: Labor Code §510This topic, taught in full in the CSLB Law & Business guide. CSLB Law & Business — Complete Study Guide (2026) — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 · 14-day refund →
Practice all 1632 questions free — no signup required.
Own the complete CSLB Law & Business guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →
Related questions on this topic
- Under Labor Code §2750.5, a worker performing services for which a contractor's license is required (Bus. & Prof. Code §7000 et seq.) and who is UNLICENSED is:
- A non-exempt framing carpenter works a 10-hour shift on a Tuesday. Under California law, how must those hours be compensated?
- A non-exempt laborer works 14 hours in one workday to finish a concrete pour. How are the final two hours (hours 13 and 14) compensated in California?
- A non-exempt worker is scheduled seven consecutive days in a single workweek. On that seventh consecutive day she works 9 hours. How is the seventh day compensated in California?
- Which of the following most accurately describes the compensation test for a bona fide 'exempt' executive or administrative employee in California?
- A contractor pays a worker below the applicable California minimum wage but claims the worker 'agreed' to the lower rate in writing. Is this agreement enforceable?
Last reviewed: · editorial process