NASAA Series 65 — All Questions

The figures these questions turn on, laid out by section on dense colour pages you can print: Series 65 cheat sheet PDF — $9.99 →

Own the complete Series 65 guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →

← Back to practice

1163 questions

Economics & Analysis

A portfolio holds two assets in equal weights. Asset X has a standard deviation of 20% and asset Y has 10%. Their returns are uncorrelated. What is the portfolio's standard deviation?

  • a.About 11.2%✓
  • b.About 15.8%
  • c.15.0%
  • d.About 22.4%

With zero correlation the portfolio variance is w²σ² for each asset added: 0.25 × 400 + 0.25 × 100 = 125, whose square root is 11.18%. The weighted average of the standard deviations, 15%, would apply only if the assets were perfectly correlated. Using unweighted variances gives 22.4%, and weighting the variances without squaring the weights gives 15.8%; both overstate the risk.

Economics & Analysis

A stock has a 30% chance of returning 20%, a 50% chance of returning 8%, and a 20% chance of returning −10%. What is its expected return?

  • a.5.0%
  • b.6.0%
  • c.10.0%
  • d.8.0%✓

Expected return is the probability-weighted average: 0.30 × 20 + 0.50 × 8 + 0.20 × (−10) = 6 + 4 − 2 = 8.0%. The simple average of the three outcomes, 6.0%, treats the scenarios as equally likely, which they are not; 10.0% leaves out the loss scenario and 5.0% averages only the best and worst cases.

Economics & Analysis

What is the Federal Reserve's reserve requirement ratio for depository institutions today?

  • a.10 percent on all transaction accounts
  • b.3 percent on the first tranche of transaction accounts only
  • c.It is set by each Reserve Bank and varies by institution size
  • d.Zero percent, in effect since March 26, 2020✓

The Board reduced reserve requirement ratios to zero percent effective March 26, 2020, which eliminated reserve requirements for all depository institutions. The 10% and 3% figures are the old ratios that applied to transaction accounts before that change. Today the Fed works mainly through the interest it pays on reserves and other tools.Federal Reserve Board, Reserve Requirements

Economics & Analysis

The Federal Reserve's discount window offers primary, secondary and seasonal credit. How does the discount rate on secondary credit compare with the rate on primary credit?

  • a.Secondary credit carries a lower rate, because those borrowers are smaller
  • b.Secondary credit carries a higher rate, and it is available only to institutions in strong financial condition
  • c.The two rates are identical, and only the collateral requirements differ
  • d.Secondary credit carries a higher rate, and it is available to institutions that are not eligible for primary credit✓

Primary credit is the main program and is for institutions in generally sound financial condition. Secondary credit is for institutions that do not qualify for primary credit and its discount rate is higher than the primary credit rate. Pricing weaker borrowers higher reflects their added risk, and strong borrowers use the primary program.Federal Reserve Board, The Discount Window

Economics & Analysis

Which body specifies the short-term objective that the Federal Reserve's open market operations are conducted to achieve?

  • a.The Board of Governors acting alone, with no committee vote
  • b.The Treasury Department, through its debt-issuance schedule
  • c.The Federal Open Market Committee✓
  • d.The Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which sets the federal funds target on its own

Open market operations are the purchase and sale of securities in the open market, and the short-term objective for them is specified by the FOMC. The New York Reserve Bank carries out the trades at the direction of the FOMC but does not set the objective, and the Treasury does not direct monetary policy.Federal Reserve Board, Open Market Operations

Economics & Analysis

A portfolio earned +20%, −10%, and +15% in three consecutive years. What is its geometric mean annual return, and how does it compare with the arithmetic mean of 8.33%?

  • a.About 7.49%, which is lower than the arithmetic mean✓
  • b.About 24.2%, the cumulative three-year return, which is higher than the arithmetic mean
  • c.About 8.07%, which is the cumulative return divided by three and is only slightly below the arithmetic mean
  • d.About 8.33%, the same as the arithmetic mean

The geometric mean compounds the returns: (1.20 × 0.90 × 1.15)^(1/3) − 1 = 7.49%. It is below the 8.33% arithmetic mean whenever returns vary, and the more volatile the returns the wider the gap. The geometric mean is the measure of the actual compound growth an investor earned.

Economics & Analysis

Investment A has an expected return of 10% and a standard deviation of 15%. Investment B has an expected return of 8% and a standard deviation of 10%. Using the coefficient of variation, which is the better risk-adjusted choice?

  • a.Investment B, with a coefficient of variation of 0.80 versus 0.67 for A
  • b.Investment B, with a coefficient of variation of 1.25 versus 1.50 for A✓
  • c.Investment A, with a coefficient of variation of 1.50 versus 1.25 for B
  • d.Investment A, because it has the higher expected return

The coefficient of variation is standard deviation divided by expected return, or risk per unit of return. A is 15 / 10 = 1.50 and B is 10 / 8 = 1.25. The lower figure means less risk per unit of expected return, so B is better on this measure. The 0.80 and 0.67 figures invert the ratio, which would mean higher is better.

Economics & Analysis

A zero-coupon bond with a $1,000 par value matures in 10 years. If it is priced to yield 5% with semiannual compounding, what is its approximate price?

  • a.About $610.27✓
  • b.About $613.91
  • c.About $500.00
  • d.About $781.20

A zero pays only par at maturity, so its price is the present value of $1,000 over 20 half-year periods at 2.5%: 1,000 / 1.025²⁰ = $610.27. Discounting annually at 5% for 10 years gives $613.91, which ignores semiannual compounding. Using only 10 half-year periods gives $781.20, and $500 treats the yield as simple interest.

Recommendations & Strategies

A 40-year-old converted a $30,000 pre-tax traditional IRA to a Roth IRA in 2025, paying tax on the whole amount. She has never made a regular Roth contribution. In 2027 she withdraws the $30,000, qualifies for no exception, and the Roth has had no earnings. What additional tax applies?

  • a.$7,500, a 25% additional tax on the converted amount
  • b.$1,500, a 5% additional tax during the five-year period
  • c.$0, because the conversion amount was already taxed
  • d.$3,000, which is a 10% additional tax on the converted amount that was taxed at conversion✓

Converted amounts that are withdrawn within the five-year period beginning with the year of conversion are subject to the 10% additional tax on the part that was included in income because of the conversion, unless an exception applies. Her withdrawal is $30,000 of conversion, so the tax is $3,000. Paying income tax on the conversion does not remove the extra tax, and the 25% rate belongs to SIMPLE IRAs in the first two years.IRC 408A(d)(3)(F); IRS Pub. 590-B

Recommendations & Strategies

A 529 plan has been maintained for the same beneficiary for more than 15 years. In 2026 the beneficiary contributes $2,000 of her own money to a Roth IRA, and the 2026 IRA contribution limit for her is $7,500. What is the most that can move from the 529 plan to her Roth IRA in 2026 under the special rollover rule, assuming she has not used any of the lifetime cap?

  • a.$7,500, because her own contribution is counted separately from the rollover
  • b.$5,500, because the annual IRA limit is reduced by her own contributions for the year✓
  • c.$35,000, because the lifetime cap can be rolled over in a single year
  • d.$2,000, because the rollover is limited to the amount she contributed herself

The special 529-to-Roth rollover is limited each year to the IRA contribution limit, reduced by contributions made that year to all IRAs for the beneficiary, which here is $7,500 − $2,000 = $5,500. The rollover must be a direct trustee-to-trustee transfer, the account must have been maintained for 15 years, and the total for the beneficiary over time is capped at $35,000. That lifetime figure is not an annual allowance.IRC 529(c)(3)(E); IRC 408A(c)(2)

Want these explained in order? Series 65 — Investment Adviser Law Study Guide (2026) — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 · 14-day refund →

Economics & Analysis

A project requires an initial investment of $2,000, and the present value of its expected cash inflows at the required return is $2,300. What is its profitability index, and what does it indicate?

  • a.0.15, which indicates that the project earns a 15% internal rate of return
  • b.1.15, which indicates that the project adds value and should be accepted✓
  • c.0.87, which indicates that the project destroys value and should be rejected
  • d.1.15, which indicates that the project should be rejected because the ratio exceeds 1

The profitability index is the present value of future cash flows divided by the initial investment: 2,300 / 2,000 = 1.15. An index above 1.0 means the NPV is positive ($300), so the project is acceptable on this test. The 0.87 figure inverts the ratio, and the 0.15 figure is the NPV per dollar invested, not an internal rate of return.

Economics & Analysis

A price-weighted index holds three stocks priced at $90, $50, and $10, with a divisor of 3, so the index is 50. The $90 stock splits 3-for-1 and now trades at $30. To keep the index at 50, what is the new divisor?

  • a.1.8✓
  • b.1.2
  • c.3.0
  • d.0.6

After the split the prices sum to 30 + 50 + 10 = 90, and keeping the index at 50 requires a divisor of 90 / 50 = 1.8. Leaving the divisor at 3 would drop the index to 30 even though nothing about the companies' value changed. Dropping the split stock from the sum gives 1.2, and the 0.6 figure divides the split price by the index.

Economics & Analysis

An investor puts $500 into a fund at the end of each of three months, when the share price is $25, $20, and then $50. What is her average cost per share over the three purchases?

  • a.$27.27✓
  • b.$31.67
  • c.$25.00
  • d.$35.00

She buys 20 + 25 + 10 = 55 shares for $1,500, so her average cost is 1,500 / 55 = $27.27. This is below the $31.67 average of the three prices because a fixed dollar amount buys more shares when the price is low. The $35.00 figure is the midpoint of the high and the low, and $25.00 is just the first purchase price.

How hard is the exam?

The NASAA Series 65 (Uniform Investment Adviser Law) qualifies investment adviser representatives: 130 scored questions plus 10 unscored pretest items in 180 minutes, and you must answer 92 of the 130 scored questions correctly to pass — NASAA states the grade is not calculated as a percentage. The exam fee is $187 and no employer sponsor is required. Securities and financial-services sales agents earn a median of about $78,140/year (BLS, May 2024).

Recommended study hours
50-100 hours for most — heavy on economics, investment vehicles and adviser regulation.
Pass rate
We read NASAA's own published material in September 2026 and there is no pass rate in it. NASAA publishes the bar and not the outcome: “At least 92 of the questions must be answered correctly for an individual to pass the Series 65 exam.”Source: NASAA — General Exam Information and content outlines (Series 63, 65, 66)
Where to focus first
Two areas tie for largest at 30% each — Client Investment Recommendations & Strategies, and Laws, Regulations & Guidelines (including the prohibition on unethical practices).

Fees and salaries are approximate and change over time. The pass rate above is quoted from the source linked beside it, for the period that source covers — where we have not checked a source, we say so and give no number.

Report