Thiệt hại & Trách nhiệmCâu 422 / 531
A spectator sits behind the dugout at an amateur ball game, is struck by a foul ball, and sues the club. The club's strongest defence is that the spectator:
a.knew of and accepted an obvious inherent risk
b.owed the club a reciprocal duty of reasonable care
c.was a licensee rather than an invitee that day
d.failed to prove the club carried enough insurance
Giải thích
Assumption of risk defeats a negligence claim when the injured person knew of a hazard inherent in an activity and voluntarily accepted it; foul balls reaching the seats are the classic illustration. The licensee-versus-invitee answer misuses premises status, which changes the degree of care owed rather than defeating the claim. How much insurance the club bought is not an element of the plaintiff's case.
Luyện miễn phí toàn bộ 531 câu hỏi — không cần đăng ký.
Own the complete California Property & Casualty Broker-Agent guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →
Câu hỏi liên quan cùng chủ đề
- An umbrella liability policy primarily provides:
- A grocer mops an aisle and leaves no warning sign; a shopper slips and fractures a wrist. Which pair of negligence elements does the unmarked wet floor most directly establish?
- States take different approaches to a plaintiff who is partly at fault. Under a comparative negligence approach, the plaintiff's recovery is:
- A driver negligently blocks a traffic lane; twenty minutes later an unrelated drunk driver strikes the stopped car. The drunk driver's conduct is best described as:
- Absolute (strict) liability differs from ordinary negligence liability because the claimant does not have to prove:
- A delivery driver rear-ends a car while making scheduled company deliveries. The employer is held liable for the driver's negligence under the doctrine of:
Cập nhật gần nhất: · quy trình kiểm tra
Đội ngũ PrepPass · Đối chiếu với California Property & Casualty Insurance License Exam · Quy trình kiểm tra