财产保险基础第 273 / 531 题
Lightning strikes a building, the fire it starts is put out with water, and the water ruins stock in the basement. Under proximate cause reasoning, the water damage is:
a.Split evenly between the two named perils
b.Covered only if water damage is also listed
c.Covered, as lightning set the chain in motion
d.Excluded, because water is the actual cause
解析
Proximate cause asks what set in motion an unbroken chain of events leading to the damage, and when a covered peril starts that chain the resulting damage is treated as loss by that peril. Lightning is the proximate cause here, so water used to fight the fire it started is a covered consequence even though water by itself is not a listed peril. Treating the last event in the chain as the cause would defeat most fire claims, since smoke and water do much of the damage.
免费刷完整 531 道题库 — 无需注册。
Own the complete California Property & Casualty Broker-Agent guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →
同考点相关题目
- Compared with a flat dollar deductible, a percentage deductible on a commercial property policy:
- A commercial property policy written on a special, open-perils causes-of-loss form covers a physical loss unless:
- A restaurant's kitchen burns and the owner also loses six weeks of profit while it is rebuilt. The lost profit is an example of:
- Two policies with no special other-insurance wording cover the same building, one for $300,000 and one for $200,000. A covered $80,000 loss occurs. On a pro rata basis, the $200,000 policy pays:
- Which of these parties holds an insurable interest in a commercial building?
- The limit of insurance shown on the declarations for a building tells the insured:
最近核对: · 审核流程
PrepPass 团队 · 依据官方资料核对 California Property & Casualty Insurance License Exam · 我们如何核对