A mutual mistake of a material fact by both parties at the time of contracting may allow:
Explanation
Civil Code §1577 defines mistake of fact as a mistake not caused by the neglect of a legal duty, consisting in unconscious ignorance or forgetfulness of a material fact, and §1567 lists mistake among the defects that make consent unreal. §1689(b)(1) makes a contract entered into through mistake rescindable, with §1692 requiring the rescinding party to restore what it received. The mistake must be MUTUAL and material: a unilateral mistake generally binds the mistaken party unless the other knew of it or caused it. (d) states the rule for exactly that unilateral case, which is why it reads plausibly. (c) confuses an honest shared error with wrongdoing; punitive damages under §3294 need oppression, fraud or malice and are unavailable on a contract claim. (a) invents a multiplier.
Law Reference: Civil Code §1567, §1577, §1689(b)(1), §1692This topic, taught in full in the CSLB Law & Business guide. CSLB Law & Business — Complete Study Guide (2026) — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 · 14-day refund →
Practice all 1632 questions free — no signup required.
Own the complete CSLB Law & Business guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →
Related questions on this topic
- A 'voidable' contract differs from a 'void' contract in that a voidable contract:
- A contractor signs a contract only after the owner threatens physical harm unless the contractor signs. The contract is most likely:
- 'Undue influence' as a ground to rescind a contract typically involves:
- Fraud in the inducement of a contract generally requires proof that a party:
- The remedy of 'restitution' in contract law is designed to:
- Consequential (special) damages in a breach case are damages that:
Last reviewed: · editorial process