A 'no oral modification' clause states that the contract may be changed only by a signed writing. Its practical purpose is to:
Explanation
The clause exists to force changes into writing so that a later dispute is settled by a document rather than by two memories — the same discipline B&P §7159(d) makes mandatory on home improvement work, where an unsigned change order is unenforceable against the buyer. (c) overstates it: Civil Code §1698(b) allows an oral agreement to modify a written contract to the extent the oral agreement is executed by the parties, and waiver or a course of conduct can defeat the clause, so 'impossible to modify' is wrong even on a commercial job. (b) confuses a documentation rule with a pricing mechanism; the price moves only if the change order says so. (a) confuses it with a warranty disclaimer, a wholly separate clause.
Law Reference: Civil Code §1698; Bus. & Prof. Code §7159(d)This topic, taught in full in the CSLB Law & Business guide. CSLB Law & Business — Complete Study Guide (2026) — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 · 14-day refund →
Practice all 1632 questions free — no signup required.
Own the complete CSLB Law & Business guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →
Related questions on this topic
- Consequential (special) damages in a breach case are damages that:
- Nominal damages are awarded when:
- A 'waiver' in the context of a contract generally refers to:
- 'Accord and satisfaction' discharges a disputed obligation when:
- The doctrine of 'impossibility' (or impracticability) may excuse performance when:
- 'Frustration of purpose' as an excuse for nonperformance applies when:
Last reviewed: · editorial process