Under a named-perils property policy, the burden of proving that a loss was caused by a covered peril rests with:
Explanation
Under a named-perils (specified perils) form, only perils listed in the policy are covered, so the insured must prove the loss was caused by one of those named perils. Under an open-perils (all-risk) form, coverage applies to any cause of loss not excluded, so the burden shifts to the insurer to prove an exclusion applies. This distinction is a core property concept and does not vary by state.
This topic, taught in full in the California Property & Casualty Broker-Agent guide. California Property & Casualty Broker-Agent Study Guide — 2026 Edition — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 · 14-day refund →
Practice all 531 questions free — no signup required.
Own the complete California Property & Casualty Broker-Agent guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →
Related questions on this topic
- Which statement BEST distinguishes a loss-settlement clause that pays on an actual cash value (ACV) basis from one that pays on a replacement-cost (RC) basis?
- Actual cash value (ACV) is most accurately calculated as:
- A commercial building is insured under a policy with an 80% coinsurance clause. The building's replacement cost is $500,000, but it is insured for only $300,000. After a $100,000 covered loss, how much will the insurer pay before any deductible?
- The purpose of a deductible in a property policy is to:
- The clause that determines how a loss is shared when two or more policies cover the same property is the:
- A commercial flat roof would cost $48,000 to replace today. It has a 20-year expected life, it was 15 years old when a covered windstorm destroyed it, and the policy settles building losses on an actual cash value basis with no deductible. What does the insurer pay?
Last reviewed: · editorial process