'Promissory estoppel' may allow enforcement of a promise, even without traditional consideration, when:

a.The promise was made in jest and no reasonable person would rely
b.The promisee relied, but the promisor had no reason to expect reliance
c.The promise was gratuitous and the promisee changed nothing in response
d.The promisor expects reliance, the promisee relies, and injustice would follow

Giải thích

Promissory estoppel substitutes detrimental reliance for bargained-for consideration: the promisor should reasonably expect the promise to induce action or forbearance, the promisee does justifiably and substantially rely, and injustice can be avoided only by enforcing the promise. In construction the classic application is a general contractor's reliance on a subcontractor's bid — Drennan v. Star Paving (1958) 51 Cal.2d 409. Each distractor removes one required element: (b) drops foreseeability of reliance, so the promisor had no reason to guard his words; (c) drops reliance itself, leaving a bare gratuitous promise that no theory enforces; (a) drops the objective reasonableness that makes reliance justifiable.

Trích dẫn luật: Drennan v. Star Paving (1958) 51 Cal.2d 409

Luyện miễn phí toàn bộ 1632 câu hỏi — không cần đăng ký.

Own the complete CSLB Law & Business guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →

Câu hỏi liên quan cùng chủ đề

Cập nhật gần nhất: · quy trình kiểm tra

Đội ngũ PrepPass · Đối chiếu với California CSLB Contractor License Law & Business Exam · Quy trình kiểm tra
Người kiểm duyệt Abraham Chen — Licensed California General Contractor (CSLB License #1101856 — kiểm tra)
Báo lỗi