A contractor leaves an unfenced excavation full of water on a vacant lot and a neighbourhood child drowns. The attractive nuisance doctrine matters here because it:

a.makes the child's parents solely responsible
b.shifts the claim to first-party medical payments
c.raises the care owed to a trespassing child
d.converts the loss into an ultrahazardous activity

Giải thích

Attractive nuisance holds an occupier responsible when an artificial condition likely to draw children — a pool, an open pit, discarded machinery — is left unguarded and a child too young to appreciate the danger is hurt, even though that child is technically a trespasser. The doctrine changes the duty owed, so calling the excavation an ultrahazardous activity misstates it. Weak parental supervision may reduce an award but does not extinguish the occupier's duty.

Luyện miễn phí toàn bộ 531 câu hỏi — không cần đăng ký.

Own the complete California Property & Casualty Broker-Agent guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →

Câu hỏi liên quan cùng chủ đề

Cập nhật gần nhất: · quy trình kiểm tra

Đội ngũ PrepPass · Đối chiếu với California Property & Casualty Insurance License Exam · Quy trình kiểm tra
Báo lỗi