意外责任险第 420 / 531 题
A grocer mops an aisle and leaves no warning sign; a shopper slips and fractures a wrist. Which pair of negligence elements does the unmarked wet floor most directly establish?
a.damages and the doctrine of vicarious liability
b.the duty of care owed and its breach
c.proximate cause and the shopper's assumed risk
d.strict liability and an intervening cause
解析
A store owes customers reasonable care, and mopping without posting a warning falls below that standard, so the unmarked wet floor supplies duty and breach. The fracture and its costs supply damages, and the causal chain supplies proximate cause; those are separate elements the claimant still has to prove. Strict liability does not apply, because routine floor cleaning is not an abnormally dangerous activity.
免费刷完整 531 道题库 — 无需注册。
Own the complete California Property & Casualty Broker-Agent guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →
同考点相关题目
- Liability that is imposed on a party regardless of fault or negligence, such as for abnormally dangerous activities, is called:
- In a liability policy, the coverage that responds to bodily injury or property damage the insured becomes legally obligated to pay is triggered by:
- An umbrella liability policy primarily provides:
- States take different approaches to a plaintiff who is partly at fault. Under a comparative negligence approach, the plaintiff's recovery is:
- A spectator sits behind the dugout at an amateur ball game, is struck by a foul ball, and sues the club. The club's strongest defence is that the spectator:
- A driver negligently blocks a traffic lane; twenty minutes later an unrelated drunk driver strikes the stopped car. The drunk driver's conduct is best described as:
最近核对： · 审核流程
PrepPass 团队 · 依据官方资料核对 California Property & Casualty Insurance License Exam · 我们如何核对