A client wants long extensions for a wedding next month but plans to remove them after the event. The MOST removable, least chemically/mechanically aggressive professional extension method commonly chosen for this short timeframe is:
Explanation
For a short-term wedding install with planned removal, sew-in wefts on braided tracks are very removable: the stylist clips the cotton or nylon thread, the wefts release, the cornrow tracks unravel, and the natural hair returns to its prior state without solvent, heat, or pulled-out strands. Fusion (option A) leaves keratin residue and requires solvent for removal. Micro-link (option B) is removable but can damage the strand at the bead point if installed too tightly. Tape-ins are usually applied with adhesive only, NOT with a fusion iron (option D mixes two systems). California licensees apply extensions under their general hair-services scope at CCR Title 16 §979.4.
Law Reference: CCR Title 16 §979.4Practice all 484 questions free — no signup required.
Related questions on this topic
- The MAIN visual and technical difference between traditional FOIL highlights and BALAYAGE is best described as:
- A salon offers Brazilian-style smoothing treatments. The chemistry-and-safety concern that California regulators have repeatedly flagged is that many such products release:
- A client asks for a 'double-process' blonde service. Compared with a single-process color, a double process means:
- The chemistry difference between a thio relaxer (ammonium thioglycolate-based) and a hydroxide relaxer (sodium hydroxide or 'lye') is best described as:
- A client books a 'scalp treatment' add-on for chronic dryness and flaking. Within California cosmetology scope, an appropriate scalp treatment includes:
- When razor cutting (using a styling/feathering razor), the BLADE ANGLE relative to the strand and the HAIR CONDITION both matter for a safe, clean cut. Best practice is to:
Last reviewed: · editorial process