合同与履行第 858 / 1605 题
Under the rule of 'contra proferentem,' an ambiguous contract term is generally construed:
a.In favor of whichever party signed first
b.In favor of the wealthier party
c.Against the party that drafted the ambiguous language
d.By flipping a coin
解析
The doctrine of contra proferentem provides that when a contract term is genuinely ambiguous, courts construe it against the party who drafted it, because that party had the opportunity to write clearly and should bear the risk of unclear language. This encourages careful drafting. It does not favor the wealthier party, the first signer, or leave interpretation to chance; the drafter bears the burden of the ambiguity.
免费刷完整 1605 道题库 — 无需注册。
同考点相关题目
- A bilateral contract is distinguished from a unilateral contract in that a bilateral contract involves:
- A homeowner tells a contractor, 'I'll pay you $1,000 if and when you finish removing the fallen tree,' and the contractor completes the removal. This is an example of acceptance of:
- A contract term is 'ambiguous' when:
- In interpreting a contract that has both typed and pre-printed (form) terms that conflict, courts commonly give priority to:
- A 'voidable' contract differs from a 'void' contract in that a voidable contract:
- A contractor signs a contract only after the owner threatens physical harm unless the contractor signs. The contract is most likely: