合同与履行第 860 / 1605 题
A 'voidable' contract differs from a 'void' contract in that a voidable contract:
a.Is valid and enforceable unless the party with the power to do so elects to disaffirm it
b.Has no legal effect whatsoever from the beginning
c.Can never be enforced by anyone
d.Must always be in writing
解析
A voidable contract is a valid, enforceable contract that one party has the legal power to affirm or to disaffirm (cancel), for reasons such as minority, fraud, duress, or undue influence. Until that party elects to void it, the contract remains in force. A void contract, by contrast, has no legal effect at all from the start, for instance because its object is illegal. Voidability is not determined by whether the contract is written.
免费刷完整 1605 道题库 — 无需注册。
同考点相关题目
- A contract term is 'ambiguous' when:
- Under the rule of 'contra proferentem,' an ambiguous contract term is generally construed:
- In interpreting a contract that has both typed and pre-printed (form) terms that conflict, courts commonly give priority to:
- A contractor signs a contract only after the owner threatens physical harm unless the contractor signs. The contract is most likely:
- 'Undue influence' as a ground to rescind a contract typically involves:
- A mutual mistake of a material fact by both parties at the time of contracting may allow: