合同与履行第 864 / 1632 题

Fraud in the inducement of a contract generally requires proof that a party:

a.A party honestly gave an opinion about what the property would be worth later
b.A party made a statement that was true when it was made but later turned out badly
c.A party failed to use precise legal language in the contract
d.A party knowingly misstated a material fact, intending to induce reliance

解析

Civil Code §1572 defines actual fraud and §1709 the tort of deceit: a representation of a material FACT, known to be false or made recklessly without belief in its truth, made to induce the other party to act, justifiable reliance, and resulting damage. (a) fails on the fact element — an honest opinion or prediction about future value is not a statement of existing fact, which is why sales talk is not actionable. (b) fails on scienter: a statement true when made does not become fraud because events later disappoint. (c) is no representation at all; drafting is not a statement of fact. The distinction pays: fraud is a tort, so unlike a contract claim it opens the door to punitive damages under Civil Code §3294, and where the fraud induced a home improvement contract, to the $500 penalty and fees in B&P §7160.

法律依据: Civil Code §1572, §1709; cf. §3294, Bus. & Prof. Code §7160

免费刷完整 1632 道题库 — 无需注册。

Own the complete CSLB Law & Business guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →

同考点相关题目

最近核对: · 审核流程

PrepPass 团队 · 依据官方资料核对 California CSLB Contractor License Law & Business Exam · 我们如何核对
审核人 Abraham Chen — Licensed California General Contractor (CSLB License #1101856 — 核实)
反馈