合同与履行第 864 / 1605 题
Fraud in the inducement of a contract generally requires proof that a party:
a.Failed to use fancy legal language
b.Merely gave an honest opinion about future value
c.Made a truthful statement that turned out badly
d.Knowingly made a false representation of a material fact, intending reliance, on which the other party justifiably relied to their detriment
解析
Fraud in the inducement typically requires a knowing (or reckless) false representation of a material fact, made with intent to induce reliance, on which the other party justifiably relied and was thereby harmed. A defrauded party may rescind and may also have a tort claim for damages. An honest opinion about the future, a truthful statement that later proves unfortunate, or the absence of legal jargon does not constitute fraud.
免费刷完整 1605 道题库 — 无需注册。
同考点相关题目
- A contractor signs a contract only after the owner threatens physical harm unless the contractor signs. The contract is most likely:
- 'Undue influence' as a ground to rescind a contract typically involves:
- A mutual mistake of a material fact by both parties at the time of contracting may allow:
- The remedy of 'restitution' in contract law is designed to:
- Consequential (special) damages in a breach case are damages that:
- Nominal damages are awarded when: