An employer discovers it overpaid an employee and, without consent, deducts the full overpayment from the next paycheck, dropping the pay below what was earned. Is this lawful?
解析
Labor Code §221 makes it unlawful for an employer to collect or receive back any part of wages already paid, and §224 permits deductions only where they are authorized by law or by the employee's written authorization and do not reduce the wage below the statutory minimum. So even a genuine overpayment must be recovered by written consent or by suit, not by self-help. (a) is the 'it wasn't earned' framing, which fails because the money became wages when it was paid. (c) confuses disclosure with authorization - itemizing an unlawful deduction on the stub satisfies §226 and still violates §221. (d) is the belief that a payroll error entitles the employer to unilateral correction; no such exception exists.
法律依据: Labor Code §§221, 224; DLSE Manual §11.2免费刷完整 1632 道题库 — 无需注册。
Own the complete CSLB Law & Business guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →
同考点相关题目
- During a busy roofing day, a foreman tells a crew they must eat lunch at their posts and remain on call to answer questions. Even though they got 30 minutes to eat, why might this still be a meal-period violation?
- A crew adopts a properly authorized 'alternative workweek schedule' of four 10-hour days. On a regular 10-hour day under that valid schedule, how are those 10 hours paid?
- Labor Code §204 generally governs how frequently wages must be paid. Which statement best reflects the timing rule for most employees?
- Which statement about gratuities (tips) is correct under California law?
- During a mandated 10-minute rest break, a security-conscious contractor requires workers to keep their radios on and respond if called. Under California law, this practice is:
- A laborer reports to the jobsite as scheduled but is sent home after only one hour because it started raining. Under California 'reporting-time pay' rules, what is the employer generally required to pay?
最近核对： · 审核流程