最近核对: · 审核流程

California Guard Card Study Guide (2026): BSIS Power to Arrest Exam

To work as an unarmed security guard in California you need a BSIS Security Guard Registration(“guard card”). The gateway is the Power to Arrest and Appropriate Use of Force training and exam, which you must pass with a score of 100% (16 CCR § 628). This free guide covers the tested essentials — every fact is cited to the California Bureau of Security & Investigative Services — then drops you into free practice questions.

The BSIS guard card at a glance

Regulator
CA Bureau of Security & Investigative Services (BSIS)
Pre-assignment training
8 hours: Power to Arrest (3h) + Appropriate Use of Force (5h)
Power to Arrest exam
Must pass with a score of 100% (16 CCR § 628); retakes allowed
Total training
40 hours, completed within 6 months of employment
Background check
Live Scan fingerprints to DOJ/FBI required
Registration validity
2 years; renew with 8 hours of CE per year
WMD & Terrorism Awareness
A 4-hour elective course (not the pre-assignment course)

The tested essentials

The five areas the Power to Arrest & Appropriate Use of Force exam keeps coming back to.

Power to arrest: you act as a private person

A security guard is not a peace officer. Your authority to detain or arrest is the same private-person (“citizen’s”) arrest authority any member of the public has — you may arrest for a misdemeanor committed or attempted in your presence, or for a felony that was in fact committed, when you have reasonable cause. This is the core of the BSIS Power to Arrest module, and it is the single most heavily tested topic. Knowing the limits of that authority — and when to observe and report instead of act — is what the exam is checking.

Appropriate Use of Force (SB 652)

Effective under SB 652, the pre-assignment course now pairs Power to Arrest with a 5-hour Appropriate Use of Force module. Force must be objectively reasonable under the circumstances; guards are trained to de-escalate first, use only the force necessary, and stop once a threat ends. Prohibited and higher-risk techniques, the duty to render aid, and the duty to report every use-of-force incident are all fair game on the exam.

Observation, documentation & the incident report

Most of a guard’s real value is observing and reporting. A good incident report is factual, objective, and complete — it answers who, what, when, where, why, and how, records events in the order they happened, and avoids opinion or conclusion. The exam tests your ability to tell an observation (“the door was open”) from an assumption(“someone broke in”), because accurate notes are what stand up later in an investigation or in court.

Communication, ethics & public relations

A guard represents the client and the employer, so professional conduct, clear radio and verbal communication, and lawful, non-discriminatory treatment of the public are tested. This includes handling difficult people calmly, following post orders, protecting confidential information, and knowing the ethical limits of the role — you enforce rules and deter, you do not act as police.

Emergency response & WMD / terrorism awareness

Guards are trained to respond to fires, medical emergencies, evacuations, and hazards, and to recognize and report suspicious activity. Weapons of Mass Destruction & Terrorism Awareness is offered as a 4-hour elective course under the BSIS syllabus — it is not part of the mandatory 8-hour pre-assignment block, a point third-party guides frequently get wrong. The tested mindset is awareness and reporting through proper channels, not intervention.

Study every topic

免费试读 —— 就在这里读
第 4 章 · 占考试 12% · 约 7 分钟读完
Observation, Documentation & Report Writing
向下滚动 ↓

Introduction

A security guard's real product is information — accurate observation, clearly documented, delivered to the people who need it. The camera does not testify; you do. A theft, an assault, a slip-and-fall, a use of force: months later, the only reliable record of what happened is the report you wrote and the notes behind it. A vague, editorial, or contradictory report loses cases; a specific, factual, chronological one wins them. This chapter teaches you to see deliberately, note contemporaneously, and write in a way that would satisfy a judge reading it five years from now.

It covers patrol technique and situational awareness, the discipline of note-taking and the 5W + H report structure, systematic suspect and vehicle descriptions, and the legal limits on photography and audio recording in a two-party-consent state.

Learning objectives

After working through this chapter you should be able to:

  • Patrol with varied patterns and situational awareness (Cooper's color codes; the OODA loop), using all your senses.
  • Take contemporaneous notes and write a report answering Who, What, When, Where, Why, How with facts, not conclusions.
  • Give a systematic head-to-toe suspect description and a CYMBALS vehicle description.
  • Apply the two-party consent rule for audio (Penal Code §632) and the privacy limits on recording (Penal Code §647(j)), and treat images as evidence.
  • Explain how contemporaneous notes refresh recollection for later testimony (Evidence Code §771).

Part A — Patrol patterns and situational awareness

Good patrols are neither random wandering nor predictable loops. A predictable patrol teaches a hostile actor exactly when you will be at the back dock; a varied patrol — changing direction, timing, and route, with deliberate pauses to listen — denies them that. Practical habits: walk against vehicle traffic so you can see drivers; use your nose (smoke, fuel, marijuana often register before anything is visible) and your ears (breaking glass, raised voices, alarms) as much as your eyes.

Two mental models anchor awareness:

  • Cooper's color codes. White = oblivious (never acceptable on duty); Yellow = relaxed alert (your normal on-duty baseline); Orange = a specific possible threat identified, plan forming; Red = acting on the threat. Live in Yellow.
  • The OODA loop. Observe, Orient, Decide, Act — cycle continuously so you keep updating on fresh information instead of locking onto your first guess.

Your post orders define the patrol path; your awareness determines whether the patrol accomplishes anything.

Part B — Notes and reports: the 5W + H, written contemporaneously

Every incident report answers six questions:

  • Who — everyone involved, with full names where available, detailed descriptions where not, witness contact information, and your own name and post.
  • What — what happened, in plain chronological order, with concrete facts ("the man swung his right fist at the cashier"), not conclusions ("he became aggressive").
  • When — specific times from your watch or radio log, for each step.
  • Where — the exact location on the property, detailed enough that a stranger could find it.
  • Why — the hardest box: stick to facts and reported statements; do not guess at motive unless the subject told you.
  • How — how the events unfolded and how they were resolved.

Take notes during the incident if it is safe, or immediately after while it is fresh. The bridge from raw notes to clean report to courtroom testimony months later is California Evidence Code §771, which allows a witness to refresh recollection from a writing made when the events were fresh. Two rules make a report defensible: write facts over conclusions ("the subject said he had three beers," not "the subject was drunk"), and apply the stranger test — could someone who was not there reconstruct what happened from your report alone? If not, rewrite it.

Part C — Suspect and vehicle descriptions that hold up

Build a suspect description head to toe so a responding officer can broadcast it without gaps: gender and approximate age; race/ethnicity if discernible; height and build; hair (color, length, style); eyes; facial hair, glasses, scars, tattoos; hat; shirt and outerwear with colors; pants; shoes; anything in the hands; and direction of travel. Practice the sequence out loud on slow shifts — the time to learn the script is not while someone is running away.

For vehicles, a common California mnemonic is CYMBALS: Color, Year, Make, Body style, All other (damage, decals, distinguishing marks), License, State. The license plate beats every other identifier — get it first if you can; if you cannot, get a partial plate and the state. For weapons, describe what you actually saw ("a black semi-automatic pistol with a stainless slide"), rather than guessing make and model. Use compass directions for travel, not "that way."

Part D — Photography, recording, and privacy

Phones make documentation easy and legally complicated at once.

  • Video without sound, in a public space or your employer's premises where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, is generally allowed.
  • Audio is the harder line. California is a two-party (all-party) consent state under Penal Code §632: it is a crime to record a confidential communication without the consent of all parties. Body cameras that capture audio in private areas implicate §632 — know whether your company policy or a posted written notice supplies the needed consent.
  • Privacy crimes. Penal Code §647(j) makes it a crime to photograph or record a person in a place where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy — restrooms, dressing rooms, hotel rooms — even with no audio.
  • Treat images as evidence. Do not edit them, do not post them to social media, and turn them over to your supervisor with a clear chain of custody.

Write and photograph as if a judge will read and view it tomorrow — because one might.

California worked example

At 9:42 p.m. a guard hears glass break near the loading dock, moves to Yellow-to-Orange, and sees a man throw a laptop bag over a fence and run west toward Elm Street in a gray hooded sweatshirt.

The report writes itself if the observation was disciplined. When: 9:42 p.m. (from the radio log). Where: northeast loading dock, exterior. Who/What (facts): "I heard glass breaking; I observed a male adult, approximately 20–30, ~5'10", medium build, gray hooded sweatshirt, dark pants, throw a dark laptop bag over the north fence and run west on Elm Street." Suspect description head-to-toe, finishing with direction of travel (west). Vehicle, if one was used, in CYMBALS order with the plate captured first. The guard does not write "the burglar" (a conclusion) but "a male adult who threw a bag and fled." If the guard used a phone to photograph the broken window, those images are evidence — unedited, handed to the supervisor, not posted anywhere. Notes taken now let the guard refresh recollection (Evidence Code §771) if called to testify next year.

Key numbers & deadlines

Awareness models: Cooper's color codes (White / Yellow / Orange / Red — operate in Yellow); OODA loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act). Vary patrol patterns; use all senses. Report structure: 5W + H (Who, What, When, Where, Why, How); chronological, specific times/names/locations, facts over conclusions. Descriptions: suspect head-to-toe, ending with direction of travel; vehicle CYMBALS (Color, Year, Make, Body, All-other, License, State). Plate beats all other IDs. Recording law: audio = two-party consent, Penal Code §632 (crime to record a confidential communication without all-party consent). Penal Code §647(j) — criminal invasion of privacy (restrooms, dressing rooms, etc.). Treat images as evidence (no edits, chain of custody). Testimony: contemporaneous notes refresh recollection — Evidence Code §771.

Named exam traps

  • "A good patrol follows the same reliable route every time." No — predictable patrols are exploitable. Vary route and timing.
  • "Write your conclusion so it's clear ('he was drunk / he was the thief')." No — write facts ("said he had three beers"; "threw a bag and fled"). Conclusions belong to others.
  • "Guess the make and model of the gun so the report looks complete." No — describe what you saw. Guessing invents evidence.
  • "You can record any conversation on duty." No — audio needs all-party consent (§632); recording a confidential conversation without it is a crime.
  • "A photo is just a photo — edit or share it freely." No — images are evidence; no edits, no social media, keep a chain of custody. Recording in restrooms/dressing rooms violates §647(j).
  • "Notes don't matter once you file the report." No — contemporaneous notes are what let you refresh recollection (Evidence Code §771) in court months later.

Key takeaways

  • Patrol with varied patterns and stay in Cooper's Yellow; run the OODA loop and use every sense.
  • Write 5W + H, chronological, specific, and factual — pass the stranger test.
  • Describe suspects head-to-toe (end with direction of travel) and vehicles by CYMBALS, capturing the plate first.
  • Audio recording needs all-party consent (§632); respect privacy (§647(j)); treat images as evidence.
  • Contemporaneous notes refresh recollection at trial (Evidence Code §771).

Sources

Cited to leginfo.legislature.ca.gov (Penal Code, Evidence Code). Awareness models (Cooper's color codes, OODA, CYMBALS) are standard security-training frameworks, not statutes.

  • Cal. Penal Code §632 — recording of confidential communications (two-party consent).
  • Cal. Penal Code §647(j) — invasion of privacy by recording/photography.
  • Cal. Evidence Code §771 — refreshing recollection from a writing.
  • Security-training frameworks: Cooper's color codes; the OODA loop (J. Boyd); CYMBALS vehicle- description mnemonic; the 5W + H report standard.
1

逮捕权

依据《加州刑法典》第834至851条所赋予的拘留与逮捕权——这些法律明确了逮捕的定义、谁可以执行逮捕(依§836执法人员对比依§837的普通公民)、何为合理依据,以及逮捕之后应如何处理。

25%
2

合理使用武力

依据加州法律,适用于私人保安行业的合理武力标准,包括作为参照的 §835a 执法人员框架、降级处置义务、致命武力与非致命武力,以及 SB 230(2020 年)在 2026 年 BSIS 教学大纲中得到延续的相关澄清。

20%
3

法律责任与法律层面问题

保安人员所面临的民事与刑事责任风险:非法拘禁、殴击、过失招聘、雇主的代位责任(respondeat superior)、依 §602 处理擅闯行为的权力,以及强制报告义务。

15%
4

观察、记录与报告撰写

巡逻技巧、环境感知、笔记记录、叙事式报告撰写、证人提问,以及保安事件报告在法庭上具有可信度所需要满足的记录标准。

12%
5

沟通、公共关系与职业伦理

客户服务原则,通过沟通进行冲突管理与降级处置,肢体语言、欺骗信号,书面沟通,以及与媒体、政府和公众打交道的方式。

10%
6

应急处置与人员安全

火灾、医疗与疏散响应;保安员的生存原则;基础急救;装备使用;以及与警察、消防与医疗救援人员的协同。

10%
7

反恐意识与大规模杀伤性武器

恐怖主义的本质,大规模杀伤性武器(化学、生物、放射性、核、爆炸),可疑活动指标,以及与相关机构协同与共享关键信息的方法。

8%

California guard card exam — frequently asked questions

What is on the California guard card (BSIS) exam?

The core test is the BSIS Power to Arrest and Appropriate Use of Force examination, covering powers of arrest, reasonable use of force, observation and documentation, communication, ethics, and emergency response. You must pass it with a score of 100% (16 CCR § 628); retakes are permitted until you pass.

How many hours of training does a California guard card require?

40 hours total, completed within 6 months of starting work. This includes an 8-hour pre-assignment block — Power to Arrest (3 hours) plus Appropriate Use of Force (5 hours) — that must be finished before you are assigned to a post, followed by additional mandatory training. Source: BSIS Security Guard Training Regulation (bsis.ca.gov).

Do I need Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) training for a guard card?

WMD & Terrorism Awareness is a 4-hour elective course under the BSIS syllabus, not part of the mandatory 8-hour pre-assignment training. The required pre-assignment courses are Power to Arrest and Appropriate Use of Force.

What score do I need to pass the Power to Arrest exam?

100%. Under 16 CCR § 628 you must answer every question correctly to complete the Power to Arrest and Appropriate Use of Force training. Retakes are allowed, and most students pass within one or two attempts.

Does a guard card let me carry a gun on duty?

No. A guard card (BSIS Security Guard Registration) authorizes unarmed work only. To carry a firearm on duty you need a separate BSIS Firearms Permit, which requires additional firearms training, a separate exam, and periodic requalification.

How long is a California guard card valid?

Two years from the date of issue. To keep it current you must complete 8 hours of continuing education each year and renew the registration with BSIS before it expires.

Is a security guard a peace officer in California?

No. A security guard acts with private-person arrest authority, not peace-officer powers. Understanding that distinction — and when to observe and report rather than intervene — is central to the BSIS Power to Arrest exam.

Sources: California Bureau of Security & Investigative Services (bsis.ca.gov), BSIS Security Guard Training Regulation. Course structure reflects the DCA Power to Arrest and Appropriate Use of Force Training Manual (July 2023) under SB 652. This is study material, not legal advice.

样题与解析

以下是本题库中的部分真题与完整解析。完整题库请用上方的刷题工具。

  1. 1. 逮捕权

    根据加州刑法典 §835,逮捕通过以下哪种方式进行?

    • a.口头宣布"你已被逮捕",因为这句宣告本身在法律上即已完成逮捕
    • b.实际限制该人的人身自由,或该人服从于执法人员的羁押
    • c.召唤警察到现场,因为逮捕只有在执法人员到达之后才开始成立
    • d.让在场证人明确指认嫌疑人,因为确定身份的那一刻逮捕即告成立

    答案: b

    解析: PC §835 将逮捕定义为通过"实际限制该人的人身自由,或该人服从于执法人员的羁押"来实施。被逮捕者可以受到为实施逮捕和拘留所合理需要的限制。口头声明 (a)、召唤警察 (c) 和证人指认 (d) 本身均不构成 §835 项下的逮捕。

    依据: Cal. Penal Code §835

  2. 2. 逮捕权

    以下哪项最能概括执法人员逮捕和私人逮捕之间的关键程序差异?

    • a.执法人员可以基于相当理由对重罪进行逮捕,即使实际上没有重罪发生;私人承担没有重罪"实际已发生"的风险
    • b.执法人员必须在限制人身自由前告知被捕者所涉指控,而实施公民逮捕的私人则完全没有此项告知义务
    • c.私人因为没有后援,可以把致命武力作为首选手段,而执法人员必须先用尽较轻的替代方式
    • d.执法人员在每次逮捕前都必须先向治安法官申请令状,除非嫌疑人正在逃跑;而私人依 §837 随时可以无令状逮捕

    答案: a

    解析: 核心程序差异是适用于私人重罪逮捕的 §837(3)"实际已发生"要求,与执法人员的 §836 相当理由标准形成对比。合理行事的执法人员即使事后证明没有重罪实际发生也受到保护;私人则不受保护。执法人员和私人都必须给予 §841 通知 (b 错误)。致命武力权限对于私人更狭窄,而非更广泛 (c)。两类人都广泛获得 §§836 和 §837 项下的无证逮捕授权 (d 错误)。

    依据: Cal. Penal Code §§836, 837; People v. Cervantez factor analysis

  3. 3. 使用武力

    Graham v. Connor (1989) 490 U.S. 386 案中,美国最高法院确立了武力的宪法合理性判断标准为:

    • a.该警员使用强制力时的主观意图,因为良好动机才使其合理
    • b.现场理性执法人员的视角,不享受事后诸葛亮的优势,考虑整体情况
    • c.被施加强制力者本人的看法,因为承受者最有条件说明当时的强制力是否过当
    • d.以结果为准的检验标准,着眼于实际造成的伤害,因此未造成伤害的强制力就是合理的,造成伤害的就是不合理的

    答案: b

    解析: Graham v. Connor 采用了第四修正案武力扣押索赔的客观合理性标准:法院从现场理性执法人员的视角判断武力,不享受事后诸葛亮的优势,考虑所有事实和情况,包括罪行的严重性、嫌疑人是否构成即时威胁,以及嫌疑人是否在积极抗拒或试图逃跑。主观意图 (a) 不是标准;嫌疑人感知 (c) 不是标准;基于结果的责任 (d) 被拒绝。虽然 Graham 涉及执法人员,但其合理性框架为私人保安的民事标准提供参考。

    依据: Graham v. Connor (1989) 490 U.S. 386

  4. 4. 使用武力

    面对多个不合作对象时,保安的武力决定应考虑:

    • a.立即升级到最高等级的强制力,因为对一群人展示压倒性力量才能最快、最安全地结束对峙
    • b.只要在场对象不止一人,使用强制力就属违法,因为寡不敌众的保安绝不可能构成合理自卫,必须撤离并报警
    • c.只有在每一名对象都实际动手打过之后才可使用强制力,这样保安才能对其施力的每个人都指出已完成的攻击
    • d.整体情况——对象数量、距离、武器、环境、可用逃跑路线和降级的可行性——根据实际威胁校准武力,并继续考虑较低武力替代方案

    答案: d

    解析: 合理性必然是整体驱动的。数量、邻近度、武器、地形和出口选项影响威胁评估,但不解除保安考虑降级和相称性的义务。反射性最大武力 (a) 是非法的且战术上差;绝对武力禁令 (b) 忽视了自卫权;等待每个对象的袭击 (c) 是危险的,在合理感知即时威胁时不是法律要求。战术撤退通常是最佳选择。

    依据: Cal. Penal Code §835a; multi-subject threat assessment

  5. 5. 责任与法律

    一名保安私下向商店经理和响应警察报告涉嫌扒手。该购物者结果是无辜的并起诉口头诽谤。最可能适用什么抗辩?

    • a.民法典 §47(c) 项下的有条件 ("共同利益") 特权——通讯在无恶意的情况下在防损和执法方面有共同利益的当事人之间进行
    • b.绝对的立法特权,该特权涵盖一个人在私人物业上向执法人员报告涉嫌犯罪时所说的任何话
    • c.诈欺防止法的书面要求,因为凡由商业交易引起的请求,除非购物者与店铺之间的基础约定已作成双方签署的书面文件,否则法院一概不予受理
    • d.工伤补偿的排他性原则,该原则排除任何因发生在保安当班期间、且属于其在该场所日常受雇职责范围之内的事件而产生的侵权请求,只能循工伤程序解决

    答案: a

    解析: 民法典 §47(c) 对在无恶意下在共享共同利益的当事人之间所作的通讯提供有条件特权。保安向商店经理 (雇主共同利益) 和警察 (执法共同利益) 的私下报告通常属于 §47(c)。该特权因恶意而败诉——知道虚假或对真相的鲁莽忽视。向无关旁观者的公开、大声指控超出特权范围。绝对立法特权 (b) 保护官方程序中的陈述,而非现场报告。诈骗法规 (c) 和工伤补偿专属性 (d) 无关。真实也是诽谤的完整抗辩,与特权分开。

    依据: Cal. Civil Code §47(c); Sanborn v. Chronicle Publishing Co. (1976) 18 Cal.3d 406

  6. 6. 观察与报告

    一名保安为记录拍摄事件现场。加州的宪法隐私权和民法典 §1708.8 意味着保安应:

    • a.任何人、任何地点、任何时间都可以随意拍摄,不受任何限制,因为在私人物业上,保安的手机与业主自己安装的固定监控摄像头在法律上处于完全相同的地位
    • b.在安保事件处理过程中绝不可拍摄任何东西,因为未经对方同意所拍下的任何人物影像,依《民法典》都属于对隐私的侵犯,营运方也不得予以保存
    • c.以合理的判断拍摄现场、证据和与事件相关的行为——避免对私人区域 (卫生间、更衣室) 的无谓关注、与事件无关的旁观者,以及对受保护私人活动的任何建设性侵入
    • d.必须先取得画面中出现的每一个人的书面同意之后才可拍摄,其中包括背景里路过的人和收银台的员工在内,因为该法条把是否取得书面同意、而不是拍摄是否合理,当作判断保安执勤期间所拍每一张照片是否合法的唯一标准

    答案: c

    解析: 用于合法事件记录的摄影是标准、可辩护的实践——事件现场、证据、伤害 (在获得同意或显见的情况下) 和可观察的行为。加州的宪法隐私权 (Cal. Const. Art I §1) 和如民法典 §1708.8 的法规警告反对对旁观者的无谓摄影、对卫生间或更衣室等私人区域的集中捕获 (这可能根据 PC §647(j) 和 §647(i) 可诉),以及侵入性使用长焦或增强设备来捕获私人活动。合理的判断、雇主政策和对隐私规范的尊重管辖合法的事件现场摄影。

    依据: Cal. Constitution Article I §1; Cal. Civil Code §1708.8

  7. 7. 沟通与公关

    良好撰写的保安事件报告应主要以以下特征为特征:

    • a.清晰、简洁和事实准确——撰写得使后来阅读的陌生人理解发生了什么
    • b.生动的形容词与富有感情色彩的措辞,好让日后读到这份报告的人体会到当晚这件事究竟有多严重
    • c.关于嫌疑人是否已经构成犯罪、以及其行为究竟触犯了哪一条法律的法律结论
    • d.撰写人本人对所涉每一方当事人的看法,以及对他们在整个接触过程中表现的评价

    答案: a

    解析: BSIS 报告撰写标准强调清晰、简洁和准确。报告必须使用中性可观察事实而非结论或观点传达谁、什么、何时、何地、为什么 (如果已知) 和如何。情感语言 (b) 在法庭上破坏可信度;法律结论 (c) 保留给检察官、法官和陪审团;观点 (d) 使作者和雇主面临诽谤索赔。标准测试:不在场的读者应仅从报告理解事件。

    依据: BSIS report-writing standards; CSI principle: clarity, brevity, accuracy

  8. 8. 应急与安全

    一名员工接到电话收到炸弹威胁。FBI/DHS 支持的协议要求接听者:

    • a.立即挂断电话并把它当作一场恶作剧完全不予理会,因为真正打算在这栋楼里放置爆炸装置的人,绝不会事先打电话向前台通报这件事情
    • b.保持在线,记录来电者的确切话语,记下声音特征和背景声音,示意同事拨打 911,在通话后,完成 FBI 炸弹威胁清单
    • c.追问来电者的姓名,并警告对方这通电话正在被追踪
    • d.通过全楼广播系统向整栋建筑通报刚刚收到了炸弹威胁,好让每一位在场的人员都能自行决定是否要在这一刻立刻离开该处场所才好

    答案: b

    解析: FBI/DHS 炸弹威胁协议要求尽可能长时间保持来电者在线,逐字记录确切话语,记下声音特征 (口音、年龄、性别、举止)、背景声音 (交通、机械、音乐、声音),以及关于装置或动机的任何具体细节。同事无声地示意 911。完成的炸弹威胁清单为调查员提供关键线索。挂断电话 (a) 销毁情报价值;威胁来电者 (c) 升级并结束通话;公共 PA 公告 (d) 引起恐慌,如果存在装置可能触发实际爆炸。

    依据: FBI/DHS Bomb Threat Stand-Off Card and Checklist

想按顺序系统学?

练习一直免费。完整的 California Guard Card (BSIS Security Guard) 学习指南是知识本身,从头到尾讲清楚 —— 可下载的 PDF + EPUB,永久归你。

获取本书 —— $9.99
反馈