EmpleoPregunta 1023 de 1605
An employer fires a worker because the worker refused to falsify safety inspection records as the boss demanded. This termination is best described as:
a.A lawful at-will discharge with no exposure
b.Wrongful termination in violation of public policy
c.A matter only for the workers' compensation system
d.Permissible because the worker disobeyed an instruction
Explicación
California recognizes a wrongful-termination-in-violation-of-public-policy claim (the Tameny doctrine). Firing an employee for refusing to break the law, for reporting illegal conduct, or for exercising a legal right violates fundamental public policy and creates employer liability despite the at-will presumption.
Referencia Legal: Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield (public policy)Practica las 1605 preguntas gratis — sin registro.
Preguntas relacionadas de este tema
- A worker is injured while intentionally starting a fistfight with a coworker over a personal grudge unrelated to the job. Is this injury likely compensable?
- California Labor Code §2922 establishes the default rule that employment having no specified term is:
- Even under at-will employment, an employer may NOT terminate an employee for which reason?
- Which employer action is most likely to unintentionally weaken the at-will presumption and create an implied promise of continued employment?
- When a contractor fires an employee, when must the employee's final wages be paid? (final-pay timing, a firing obligation)
- A contractor willfully fails to pay a discharged employee's final wages on time. Under Labor Code §203, the employer may owe a 'waiting-time penalty' equal to:
Última revisión: · proceso editorial
Sen Lin, Fundador de PrepPass · Verificado con California CSLB Contractor License Law & Business Exam · Cómo revisamos
Revisado por Abraham Chen — Licensed California General Contractor (CSLB License #1101856 — verificar)