EmpleoPregunta 1024 de 1605
Which employer action is most likely to unintentionally weaken the at-will presumption and create an implied promise of continued employment?
a.Telling employees repeatedly that they will 'have a job here as long as they do good work'
b.Requiring new hires to sign an at-will acknowledgment
c.Stating clearly in the handbook that employment is at-will
d.Keeping employment terms silent
Explicación
Repeated oral assurances of job security, longevity, promotions, and consistent good reviews can create an implied-in-fact contract that limits at-will termination to good cause. Employers preserve at-will status by using clear written disclaimers and avoiding promises of continued employment.
Referencia Legal: At-will; implied contractPractica las 1605 preguntas gratis — sin registro.
Preguntas relacionadas de este tema
- California Labor Code §2922 establishes the default rule that employment having no specified term is:
- Even under at-will employment, an employer may NOT terminate an employee for which reason?
- An employer fires a worker because the worker refused to falsify safety inspection records as the boss demanded. This termination is best described as:
- When a contractor fires an employee, when must the employee's final wages be paid? (final-pay timing, a firing obligation)
- A contractor willfully fails to pay a discharged employee's final wages on time. Under Labor Code §203, the employer may owe a 'waiting-time penalty' equal to:
- Under the California WARN Act, a covered employer conducting a mass layoff or plant closing generally must give affected employees how much advance notice?
Última revisión: · proceso editorial
Sen Lin, Fundador de PrepPass · Verificado con California CSLB Contractor License Law & Business Exam · Cómo revisamos
Revisado por Abraham Chen — Licensed California General Contractor (CSLB License #1101856 — verificar)