Responsabilidad y CasualidadPregunta 416 de 531
To win a negligence claim, an injured party generally must prove all of the following EXCEPT:
a.A legal duty was owed
b.Actual damages resulted from the breach
c.The duty was breached
d.The defendant intended to cause harm
Explicación
Negligence requires proving duty, breach of that duty, proximate cause, and actual damages, but it does not require intent to cause harm; negligence is about carelessness, not intent. An intentional act that causes harm is a separate category (an intentional tort) and is generally excluded from liability insurance. This makes intent the element that does not belong in a negligence claim.
Practica las 531 preguntas gratis — sin registro.
Own the complete California Property & Casualty Broker-Agent guide — PDF + EPUB, $24.99 →
Preguntas relacionadas de este tema
- Un dueño de bar golpea intencionalmente a un cliente durante una discusión y es demandado por agresión. El dueño presenta el reclamo bajo su póliza CGL. La aseguradora MUY PROBABLEMENTE:
- Un espectador en un partido de béisbol es golpeado por una pelota de foul y demanda al estadio. Según la ley de California, ¿qué defensa es MÁS PROBABLE que el estadio invoque?
- The failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise under similar circumstances is the legal definition of:
- Liability that is imposed on a party regardless of fault or negligence, such as for abnormally dangerous activities, is called:
- In a liability policy, the coverage that responds to bodily injury or property damage the insured becomes legally obligated to pay is triggered by:
- An umbrella liability policy primarily provides:
Última revisión: · proceso editorial
Equipo de PrepPass · Verificado con California Property & Casualty Insurance License Exam · Cómo revisamos