合同与履行第 890 / 1605 题
Overall, the single most effective way for a contractor to prevent and win contract disputes over scope, extras, and payment is to:
a.Use a clear, complete written contract and document all changes with signed written change orders
b.Rely on verbal agreements and good relationships alone
c.Never put payment terms in writing
d.Avoid defining the scope so there is flexibility
解析
The most effective protection against disputes is a clear, complete written contract that defines the scope, price, schedule, and payment terms, combined with documenting every change through signed written change orders. Clear writings create reliable evidence and reduce misunderstandings. Relying on verbal agreements, leaving the scope vague, or omitting payment terms invites exactly the disputes that written documentation is designed to prevent, and can also run afoul of license-law writing requirements.
免费刷完整 1605 道题库 — 无需注册。
同考点相关题目
- A 'severability' (savings) clause provides that if one provision of the contract is found invalid:
- An 'attorney fees' clause in a contract typically provides that:
- A contractor and owner sign a contract, then later sign a separate written agreement that clearly changes the completion date and adds $6,000 in scope. This later signed agreement is best described as:
- In a T&M contract dispute, the single most important documentation supporting the contractor's invoices is usually:
- An owner and contractor dispute whether a certain task was included in the fixed price. The contract's clear, integrated scope of work does not list that task. Under general interpretation principles, the task is most likely:
- A key reason a contractor should ensure the person signing a contract has authority to bind the property is that: