Explorar todas las preguntas

La sección 2070 dispone que todas las pólizas de incendio sobre bienes situados en California serán emitidas en el formulario estándar (el que recoge el §2071) y, salvo lo previsto en el artículo, no contendrán añadidos. Una póliza que cubra solo incendio, o incendio junto con otros riesgos, puede apartarse de esa redacción únicamente cuando la cobertura de incendio que otorga sea sustancialmente equivalente o más favorable al asegurado que la del formulario estándar. Es un piso, no un techo: más amplio se permite, más estrecho no. (a) es incorrecta porque el §2070 prescribe un formulario y no una aprobación previa de cada póliza; (b) es incorrecta porque California tiene formulario estándar de incendio desde hace décadas; y (d) invierte la regla, que se aplica en general a las pólizas sobre bienes situados en California.

La HO-3 es la mas comun en California porque da peligros abiertos en la vivienda (A) y otras estructuras (B), pero mantiene peligros NOMBRADOS en bienes personales (C). Para abrir los peligros tambien en bienes personales se sube a la HO-5 Comprensiva.

La lista basica (FELLW + extendida) incluye fuego, explosion, rayo, viento/granizo, humo, vehiculos, aeronaves, vandalismo, disturbios, sumidero y accion volcanica. El TERREMOTO se excluye en las formas estandar; California exige OFRECER cobertura sismica aparte (CEA o stand-alone) bajo §10081/§10089.

La cláusula de avalúo del §2071 dispone que, si el asegurado y el asegurador no logran acordar el valor real en efectivo o el monto de la pérdida, a solicitud escrita de cualquiera de ellos cada parte elegirá un perito competente y desinteresado y notificará a la otra el perito elegido dentro de los 20 días siguientes a la solicitud. Los dos peritos eligen luego a un tercero en discordia, y el laudo acordado por dos cualesquiera de los tres fija el monto. (a) es incorrecta porque las partes eligen a sus propios peritos y el Comisionado no interviene; (b) es incorrecta porque la cláusula existe justamente para que una disputa de valor no tenga que empezar en los tribunales; y (d) es incorrecta porque el avalúo es el recurso del asegurado frente a la cifra del asegurador.

El movimiento de tierra (incluido terremoto) se excluye en las formas HO-3 estandar. Los §10081 y §10089 obligan a las aseguradoras admitidas a OFRECER cobertura sismica, normalmente vie CEA o poliza separada.

Inundacion, agua superficial, olas, marea y desbordamiento estan EXCLUIDAS en todas las formas estandar HO y DP. La cobertura contra inundacion se compra aparte, normalmente vie NFIP o aseguradora privada. Viento/granizo no aplica porque el origen fue el agua, no el viento.

HO y DP incluyen LIMITES ESPECIALES para robo de joyas, armas, plateria, efectivo, valores y bienes similares. Para asegurar al valor real conviene PROGRAMARLOS en un personal articles floater (PAF) o endoso marino interior, detallando cada articulo con su tasacion.

Bajo §2051, ACV = Costo de Reposicion menos Depreciacion: $24,000 - $14,000 = $10,000. El asegurado absorbe la depreciacion restante salvo que tenga endoso RC y termine la reparacion.

El costo de reposicion paga el costo actual de reparar/reemplazar con calidad y tipo similares, sin restar depreciacion. ACV resta la depreciacion. Esta diferencia es lo que hace valioso el RC para techos y casas antiguas.

El RC es condicional a reparar/reconstruir. La aseguradora paga el ACV por adelantado y RETIENE la depreciacion (la 'recuperable') hasta que el asegurado pruebe que terminaron las obras dentro del plazo, normalmente 12-24 meses en California (extendible a 36 meses para desastres declarados bajo §2051.5).

80% de $500,000 = $400,000 requeridos. Asegurado lleva $300,000; fraccion = 300/400 = 75%. Pago = 75% × $40,000 = $30,000. El asegurado absorbe $10,000 de penalidad. El coaseguro aplica solo a perdidas PARCIALES; una total se pagaria hasta el limite de $300,000.

El coaseguro controla el INFRASEGURO, no limita el pago. Aplica solo a perdidas PARCIALES. Una perdida total se paga hasta el limite sin penalidad, porque no hay 'recuperacion parcial' que medir.

Bajo la clausula ESTANDAR, los derechos del acreedor NO se pierden por actos del asegurado. El prestamista cobra hasta su saldo. La asegurada se niega por perdida intencional y la aseguradora se subroga al pagare. Bajo la clausula ABIERTA, el prestamista tambien se quedaria sin cobrar.

La cláusula de demanda del formulario estándar del §2071 dispone que ninguna demanda o acción sobre la póliza podrá sostenerse a menos que se hayan cumplido todos los requisitos de la póliza y a menos que se entable dentro de los 12 meses siguientes al inicio de la pérdida. Cuando la pérdida se relaciona con un estado de emergencia según se define en el §8558(b) del Código de Gobierno, ese plazo se extiende a 24 meses. (a) toma prestado el plazo de cuatro años del contrato escrito, que la cláusula más breve de la propia póliza desplaza; (c) inventa un plazo de seis meses contado desde la prueba de pérdida y no desde el inicio de la pérdida; y (d) es incorrecta porque los 24 meses son la extensión por estado de emergencia, no la regla universal, y California permite expresamente este plazo abreviado en el formulario estándar.

La disposicion de vacancia estandar en HO-3 (y DP-3) suspende o reduce la cobertura de vandalismo, vidrio, agua, robo y dano por hielo/nieve si la vivienda esta VACANTE mas de 60 DIAS CONSECUTIVOS antes de la perdida. El vandalismo suele excluirse por completo despues de los 60 dias.

La clausula par y conjunto exige pagar una PROPORCION razonable del valor del conjunto. Ni paga el conjunto como perdida total ni ignora la perdida de valor de las restantes. El objetivo es indemnizar sin enriquecer.

El salvamento es el derecho de la aseguradora, tras pagar la perdida total, a tomar la propiedad danada y recuperar su valor residual. Complementa la indemnizacion: el asegurado cobra la perdida pero no conserva tambien el auto para revenderlo y lucrar.

Desgaste, oxido, corrosion, deterioro gradual y el moho resultante estan EXCLUIDOS en la HO-3 estandar. El seguro de propiedad cubre eventos SUBITOS Y ACCIDENTALES, no consecuencias lentas del envejecimiento o negligencia. Una rotura SUBITA seria una cuestion distinta y podria estar cubierta.

Actual cash value equals the current cost to replace the item minus depreciation for age, wear, and condition. It reflects what the used property is actually worth at the time of loss. Replacement cost coverage, by contrast, pays to replace the item with a new one of like kind and quality without deducting depreciation, subject to policy conditions, and is a valuable option for personal property.

An open-perils form covers any cause of loss that is not specifically excluded, so the insurer must prove an exclusion applies to deny a claim. This is broader than a named-perils form, which covers only the perils listed and requires the insured to prove the loss came from a named peril. Open-perils coverage generally costs more because it is broader.

A deductible is the portion of a covered loss the insured pays before the insurer pays. With a $1,000 deductible on a $6,000 loss, the insured absorbs $1,000 and the insurer pays the remaining $5,000. Deductibles lower premiums and discourage small claims by giving the insured a financial stake in each loss.

Standard homeowners forms exclude flood; flood coverage must be obtained separately. Earth movement (such as earthquake) is also typically excluded and added by endorsement or a separate policy. Fire, windstorm, and theft are covered perils under standard forms. Knowing which catastrophic perils are excluded from the base policy is essential for identifying coverage gaps.

Subrogation is the insurer's right, after paying a covered claim, to step into the insured's position and pursue the third party responsible for the loss. It prevents the insured from collecting twice and supports the principle of indemnity. The insured must avoid any action after a loss that would impair the insurer's ability to subrogate, such as signing away claims against the responsible party.

Actual cash value is replacement cost minus depreciation, and depreciation estimates the value used up through age, wear and the remaining useful life of the item. The answer built on resale price confuses depreciation with market movement, which can rise or fall for reasons unrelated to wear. The premium an insured has paid has no bearing on how much value the property has lost.

Fifteen of the twenty years of life are used up, so depreciation is 75% of $16,000 and the actual cash value is $4,000; subtracting the $1,000 deductible leaves $3,000. The $4,000 figure stops before the deductible. The $15,000 figure settles at replacement cost and ignores depreciation entirely, and $11,000 comes from depreciating only 25% of the roof.

The unendorsed homeowners form pays replacement cost for the dwelling but settles personal property at actual cash value, so contents are depreciated unless a replacement-cost-on-contents endorsement is added. The choice that reverses the two bases is the common mix-up. The market-value answer confuses what a buyer would pay with what it costs to repair or replace.

Replacement cost policies pay the depreciated amount first and hold the depreciation back, releasing it after the insured completes the repair or replacement and submits proof of the cost. Calling that hold-back salvage confuses the insurer's right to damaged property with a timing device. The held-back sum is not a permanent share of the loss borne by the insured, provided the work is done.

The first payment on a replacement cost policy is the actual cash value of the damage less the deductible: $23,000 minus $1,000 is $22,000. The $23,000 figure forgets the deductible. The $31,000 total becomes payable only after the repairs are finished and receipts are submitted, when the $9,000 of recoverable depreciation is released.

Functional replacement cost pays to rebuild with modern, commonly available materials that do the same job, drywall in place of plaster for example, rather than duplicating obsolete construction. The answer describing what a buyer would pay is market value, a different measure. Deducting depreciation describes actual cash value, and duplicating the original materials is full replacement cost.

Insurable value is the cost to rebuild the structure, and the lot underneath it is not exposed to fire, wind or theft, so land value is left out of the dwelling limit. Market value includes the land and reflects location, demand and financing. The answers that fold land into the amount insured lead owners to buy far more coverage than a rebuild would ever cost.

The dwelling limit insures the cost to rebuild the structure, which is the builder's $310,000 estimate; land is not insured because it cannot be destroyed. The $460,000 sale price is market value and includes the lot. Setting the limit at the $370,000 mortgage balance insures the lender's debt rather than the building, and $150,000 is the land by itself.

The fraction is the amount of insurance carried divided by the amount required, which is the coinsurance percentage times the property's value, and that fraction is applied to the loss. Flipping the fraction so the required amount sits on top produces a payment larger than the loss, which indemnity forbids. Dividing by full value rather than the required amount understates every payment.

The required amount is 80% of $250,000, or $200,000; carrying $150,000 gives a ratio of 0.75, and 0.75 of the $40,000 loss is $30,000. Paying the full $40,000 ignores the coinsurance clause altogether. The $24,000 answer divides the insurance carried by the full $250,000 value instead of the $200,000 required, and $32,000 simply takes 80% of the loss.

Eighty percent of $400,000 is $320,000 required; the $280,000 carried gives 0.875, and 0.875 of $50,000 is $43,750, from which the $2,500 deductible leaves $41,250. Stopping at $43,750 forgets the deductible, which comes off after the ratio is applied. Paying $47,500 takes the deductible but ignores the penalty, and $35,000 divides by the $400,000 value rather than the $320,000 required.

Ninety percent of $320,000 is $288,000 required, and the $300,000 carried exceeds it, so no coinsurance penalty applies and the loss is paid in full less the $1,000 deductible: $59,000. The $60,000 figure forgets the deductible. The two lower figures apply a ratio of $300,000 to the $320,000 value, but the formula compares insurance carried with the amount required, not with full value.

Because the amount of insurance is at least 80% of full replacement cost, the form settles a partial building loss at replacement cost, so the insurer pays the $18,000 repair cost less the $1,000 deductible. The $11,000 answer settles the damaged portion at its depreciated $12,000 value, which is what applies when that 80% test is failed. Taking 80% of the loss is no part of the settlement.

The loss is first multiplied by the carried-over-required fraction, and the deductible then comes off that reduced figure, so the insured absorbs both. Taking the deductible off first changes the base the ratio is applied to and yields a different number. The deductible is neither prorated by the ratio nor forgiven because a penalty was assessed.

A percentage deductible is stated as a percent of the amount of insurance on the dwelling, so it grows every time that limit is raised, while a flat deductible stays at a set dollar figure until it is changed. The premium-based answer is not how any deductible is computed. The two fixed-dollar descriptions define the flat deductible, which is the thing being contrasted.

The percentage deductible runs on the amount of insurance, so it is 2% of $280,000, or $5,600, leaving $28,400 of the $34,000 loss. The $27,000 answer takes 2% of the home's $350,000 replacement cost instead of the limit shown on the declarations. Applying the 2% to the loss itself gives only a $680 deductible, and $34,000 ignores the deductible.

A named-perils form covers only the causes of loss it lists, so the insured carries the burden of showing the damage came from one of them. The answer that puts the exclusion burden on the insurer states the open-perils rule, which is the reverse arrangement. Making the insurer prove a listed peril would turn a named-perils form into open-perils coverage.

Open-perils forms cover any direct physical loss unless it is excluded, so after the insured establishes that fortuitous damage happened, the burden moves to the insurer to point at an exclusion. Requiring a listed peril describes named-perils coverage. Preventability and the size of the deductible are separate questions and do not decide whether the loss falls inside the insuring agreement.

A direct loss is the physical damage the peril causes; an indirect or consequential loss is the money loss that flows from it, such as additional living expense, lost rent or spoiled food. The choice describing physical damage from the peril defines direct loss, the very thing being contrasted. A neighbor's peril and the deductible have nothing to do with the distinction.

Additional living expense is a consequential loss: the hotel bills are not physical damage, they are money the family spends because the damage made the home unfit to live in. Burned cabinets, smoke-damaged clothing and a water-soaked floor are all direct physical damage, whether the water came from the fire hose or the fire itself.

Proximate cause is the peril that sets in motion an unbroken chain of events ending in the loss, and coverage turns on whether that peril is insured. Picking the last event in the sequence would let an uncovered final step defeat coverage the original covered peril triggered. Proximate cause identifies a cause of loss, not a responsible person or the biggest repair item.

Water applied to extinguish a covered fire is part of the unbroken chain the fire started, so the fire remains the proximate cause and the ceiling damage is a fire loss. Calling it excluded water damage misreads the chain and would leave almost every fire claim half paid. Back-up coverage deals with water rising through drains and sewers, which is not what happened here.

Pro rata sharing divides the loss in proportion to each policy's limit against the total insurance in force, so a larger limit carries a larger share. Splitting the loss down the middle ignores the limits and overcharges the smaller policy. The approach where one policy sits above the other is an excess other-insurance clause, not pro rata sharing.

Total insurance in force is $250,000, so the larger policy carries 150/250, or 60%, of the loss, which is $24,000, and the smaller policy pays the remaining $16,000. The $20,000 answer splits the loss evenly and ignores the limits. The full $40,000 would apply only if the second policy did not exist or sat in excess.

Total insurance is $200,000, so the smaller policy carries 80/200, or 40%, of the $50,000 loss, which is $20,000, while the larger policy pays $30,000. The $25,000 answer divides the loss equally between the insurers. Paying the whole $50,000 would ignore the other-insurance condition entirely.

Insurable interest means suffering a real financial loss if the property is damaged, and a mortgagee stands to lose its security, so it may be named on the policy. A neighbor's enjoyment of a view is not a financial stake in the building. A rejected buyer holds no ownership or contract right, and a contractor's interest ended when the finished job was paid for.

Indemnity limits recovery to the insured's own financial interest, and hers is half the building, so $150,000 is the ceiling no matter what limit she bought. Collecting the whole limit or the whole building value would pay her for her partner's loss as well and leave her better off than before the fire. Halving her share a second time has no basis in the ownership.

A limit caps what the insurer can be required to pay; the payment itself is measured by the loss, the valuation basis and the deductible, and is usually far smaller. Treating the limit as a guaranteed sum is the misunderstanding behind demands for the whole limit after a small fire. The limit is also not the insurer's appraisal of the property, and it is a maximum rather than a minimum.

A blanket limit is a single amount standing behind two or more buildings, locations or categories of property, so it can flow to wherever the loss happens. The descriptions naming one item at one location, or a separate limit for each building, both define specific insurance, the arrangement blanket coverage is contrasted with. Blanket is not an excess layer above other limits.

Under an agreed value provision the insurer and the insured settle on a value in advance, usually from a signed statement of values, and the coinsurance condition is set aside so no penalty can be assessed on a partial loss. It does not remove the deductible, which still applies to every loss. Automatic increases in the limit describe inflation guard, a different feature.

A stated amount fixes a ceiling rather than a promise: the insurer pays the smallest of the stated figure, the actual cash value, or what it costs to repair or replace, so the insured is indemnified rather than enriched. Paying the stated sum regardless of value describes an agreed value approach. Choosing the greater of two figures would pay more than the loss.

Inflation guard raises the amount of insurance automatically to track construction costs, so 4% of $240,000 adds $9,600 and the limit renews at $249,600. Leaving the limit at $240,000 describes a policy with no inflation guard at all. The $259,200 figure doubles the percentage to 8%, and $230,400 moves the limit in the wrong direction.

Unoccupied means people are away while the property stays furnished and the owners intend to return; vacant means the building is empty of both occupants and contents. Because the furnishings are still in place the house is unoccupied, and that matters because forms restrict certain perils once a building has stood vacant. Abandonment means giving up all claim to the property.

The standard mortgage clause is a separate agreement between the insurer and the lender, so the lender's right to payment survives acts of the owner, such as arson or misrepresentation, that void the owner's own claim. Treating the two claims as one destroys the security the clause exists to give. The mortgagee need not sue the borrower first and is not paid out of the owner's settlement.

Each party selects and pays its own competent appraiser, the two appraisers choose an umpire, and an agreement signed by any two of the three sets the amount of loss. Letting one side's appraiser or a one-sided umpire decide would defeat the balance the clause is built on. Appraisal settles value only; whether the loss is covered at all stays with the policy.

Property policies contain an abandonment condition: the insured cannot hand damaged property to the insurer and demand the limit, because the insurer chooses whether to pay, repair, replace or take the property at an agreed value. Salvage the insurer does take belongs to the insurer, which has already paid for the loss. The condition sets no deadline for disposing of it.

Subrogation transfers the insured's right of recovery to the insurer once the claim is paid, so the insurer steps into the insured's place and pursues the contractor for the $80,000 it paid out. It does not let the insurer pay less up front because someone else was at fault; the insured is paid first and recovery comes later. Amounts recovered beyond the insurer's outlay are not its to keep.

The pair or set clause measures the loss as the difference between the value of the set before the loss and the value of what is left, which is $2,400 minus $1,500, or $900. That is more than the $600 one chair alone would fetch, because breaking the set destroys value in the survivors. The insurer need not pay the whole $2,400 unless it chooses to take the set.

Other structures is a percentage sublimit, 10% of the $260,000 dwelling limit, so $26,000 is the most available for the garage even though the loss less the deductible comes to $30,000. Paying $30,000 ignores the sublimit. Subtracting the deductible from the limit to reach $25,000 reverses the order: the deductible comes off the loss, and the sublimit then caps the result.