Browse all questions

§8430(a) makes the lien a direct lien for the lesser of two amounts: the reasonable value of the work the claimant provided, and the price agreed with whoever contracted for that work. §8430(c) adds that where the contract was rescinded, abandoned or breached the lien may not exceed reasonable value. So the ceiling is the unpaid value of what was actually furnished, which is what (b) ignores — money already received has to come off the claim. (a) treats interest and fees as if they were principal, and they are not part of the lien amount. (d) confuses the security with the debt: the lien attaches to the property, but its size is measured by the work. The sanction behind all of this is §8422(c) — a claimant who willfully includes labour, services, equipment or materials never furnished for that property forfeits the lien entirely — while §8422(a) forgives an honest error in the demand. The preliminary notice this subcontractor served matters separately: §8410 lets a claimant enforce a lien only if that notice was given and proof of it made.

Recording a Notice of Completion shortens the lien-recording period: the direct contractor then has 60 days and subcontractors/suppliers have 30 days, instead of the 90-day period that applies when no such notice is recorded.

Under Civil Code §8460, a recorded mechanics' lien must be enforced by filing a foreclosure lawsuit within 90 days of recording. Because more than 90 days passed with no lawsuit, the lien has expired and become unenforceable.

A conditional waiver and release becomes effective only when the claimant actually receives the payment. An unconditional waiver releases lien rights immediately and should not be signed until payment has truly cleared.

Under Civil Code §8424, a lien release bond must be 125% of the claimed lien amount. For a $40,000 lien, that is $50,000. The bond substitutes as security so the claimant's recovery shifts from the property to the bond.

Under Civil Code §8800, on a private work the owner must pay the direct contractor any retention within 45 days after completion of the work of improvement, unless there is a good-faith dispute. Wrongful withholding can expose the owner to a penalty plus the amount withheld.

Under Civil Code §8506, a stop payment notice served on a construction lender must be accompanied by a bond of 125% of the claim amount to obligate the lender to withhold funds. The bond protects the lender if the claim is later found invalid.

§8188(a) lets the owner record a notice of cessation once labour on the work of improvement has stopped for a continuous period of at least 30 days that is still continuing on the day of recording, and §8188(c) requires the notice to state the date labour ceased and that the stoppage has continued. What it buys the owner is time: §8412 cuts the direct contractor's window to 60 days after the notice is recorded instead of 90 days after completion, and §8414 cuts every other claimant's window to 30 days. (d) inverts precisely that. (a) goes much too far — the notice starts a clock, it extinguishes nothing, and a claimant who records inside the shortened window has a perfectly good lien. (c) has nothing to do with the lien statutes and is impossible anyway, since B&P §7075.1(a) forbids transferring a licence. The notice matters most on exactly the facts given: on an abandoned job completion may never occur, so without it the 90-day clock never starts to run.

§3706 removes the bargain that makes workers' compensation an exclusive remedy: if the employer fails to secure the payment of compensation, the injured employee or the dependents may bring an action at law against that employer for damages as if the division did not apply. §3708 then stacks the deck, and deliberately — in such an action the injury is presumed to be a direct result of the employer's negligence with the burden on the employer to rebut it, and contributory negligence, assumption of risk and the negligence of a fellow servant are all unavailable as defences, with no contract able to restore them. §3716(a) supplies the parallel route: where the employer does not pay an award, the director pays it from the Uninsured Employers Benefits Trust Fund. That is why (a) and (b) both understate the remedy, and why (d) points at the wrong security — the licence bond has its own beneficiaries under B&P §7071.5 and is not a substitute for workers' compensation.

Labor Code §3715 allows an injured worker of an uninsured employer to file a claim against the Uninsured Employers Benefit Trust Fund administered by the Department of Industrial Relations. The fund pays benefits and then pursues the uninsured employer for reimbursement.

§4604.5(c)(1) is the cap, and it runs per discipline rather than pooled: for injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2004, an employee is entitled to no more than 24 chiropractic, 24 occupational therapy and 24 physical therapy visits per industrial injury. That is what makes (c) the tempting wrong answer — it merges the three into a single allowance the statute never creates — and (a) simply cuts the figure by more than half. (b) ignores the cap altogether. There are two genuine exits, and both matter in practice: under §4604.5(c)(2)(A) the employer may authorise additional physical medicine visits in writing, and paying for or authorising treatment beyond the limit is not a waiver of the limit for future requests; and under §4604.5(c)(3) the cap does not apply to post-surgical physical medicine and rehabilitation provided under the post-surgical treatment utilization schedule the administrative director adopts pursuant to §5307.27. The underlying duty to provide medical treatment is §4600.

§5307.1(a) directs the administrative director, after public hearings, to adopt and periodically revise an official medical fee schedule setting reasonable maximum fees for the treatment, care, services and goods described in §4600, with most of its structure tied to the relevant Medicare and Medi-Cal payment systems. That schedule, not the provider's own price list, caps what the workers' compensation insurer pays, which disposes of (b). (c) borrows the wrong payer: group health rates are a private contract between a plan and a provider and have no bearing on the schedule. (d) mistakes who the parties even are — the injured worker does not negotiate the medical bill, which runs between provider and claims administrator, and a disputed bill goes to independent bill review rather than to the worker. §139.6, cited here by mistake often enough to be worth naming, is the information and assistance program that publishes the guides and pamphlets injured workers receive.

§4650(a) requires the first payment of temporary disability indemnity no later than 14 days after knowledge of the injury and the disability, and on that date all indemnity then due must be paid, unless liability has already been denied. The penalty for missing it is automatic: §4650(d) increases a late payment by 10 percent, payable to the employee without any application, unless wages are being continued under a salary continuation plan. (c) is the practical error worth killing off: the 14 days run from knowledge, not from acceptance, so an employer still investigating must either pay or deny rather than wait. (a) and (d) both start the clock at the date of injury and then stretch it — the statute uses knowledge of the injury and of the resulting disability, which can arrive well after the injury itself. §4650(b)(1) carries the same pattern into permanent disability: the first payment falls due within 14 days after the last payment of temporary disability indemnity.

A builder's risk policy is property insurance on the work in progress, so (a), (b) and (d) are its bread and butter: fire, theft and windstorm are all covered physical losses to the project while it is being built. The standard form excludes the cost of making good faulty workmanship, material or design, which means that when the defective component is the very thing that fails, repairing it is the contractor's cost and not the insurer's. The distinction worth carrying into the exam is that resulting damage to other, sound parts of the project is usually still covered — it is the defective work itself that is carved out — and that this exclusion is a property-insurance rule, not a substitute for the completed-operations cover a general liability policy provides after the job is finished.

A standard homeowner's form insures a finished dwelling and its contents. A house being built or substantially renovated is either excluded outright or capped at a fraction of the dwelling limit, and materials not yet installed are usually covered only under a small building-materials or off-premises sublimit. Closing that gap is exactly what a builder's risk policy is written for: it covers the structure, the fixtures and the materials against physical loss for the construction period and then ends. (a) states the opposite of the exclusion, and it is the belief that leaves an owner uninsured in the middle of a build. (b) invents a dollar trigger; nothing makes builder's risk turn on contract size, though a construction lender will usually require it whatever the size. (c) mixes up the two families of insurance: injuries to third parties and the lawsuits they bring are liability cover, whereas both homeowner's property cover and builder's risk answer physical damage to the property itself.

A named insured is a party to the policy in its own right: it can present a claim, it receives notices and cancellation, it owes the duty to cooperate, and it is on the hook for premium — which is why a subcontractor usually pays for the privilege through the contract price. An additional insured has derivative cover instead, limited to liability arising out of the named insured's work and subject to that policy's terms. None of the other three describes either status. (b) inverts the whole point of being insured. (c) is what an ordinary third-party claimant is, and precisely what a named insured is not. (d) invents a percentage-of-completion cut-off that builder's risk forms do not use; those policies end on occupancy, acceptance, or a stated expiry date, whichever the form specifies.

Civil Code §8484 creates a design professional's lien for licensed architects, registered engineers, and licensed land surveyors who have prepared plans for a work of improvement that is never commenced. It is distinct from a mechanics' lien, which generally requires that improvements actually be made to the property.

§9550(a) requires a direct contractor awarded a public works contract involving an expenditure in excess of $25,000 to give a payment bond before work commences, and §9100(a) names who may claim on it: anyone who provided work authorised by the direct contractor, a subcontractor, the architect, the project manager or another person having charge of part of the contract, plus laborers — which reaches a second-tier supplier. §9100(b) carves out the single party that may not claim, the direct contractor itself. (b) is the reason the bond exists: public property is not subject to a mechanics lien, so there is nothing to record against. (c) borrows the wrong bond — the §7071.6 licence bond answers to the beneficiaries §7071.5 lists, and an unpaid supplier reaches it only through the willful-violation or fraud door. (d) picks a professional liability policy, which covers the architect's own negligence rather than unpaid invoices. The other route §9100(a) opens is a stop payment notice to the public entity.

The two remedies chase different assets. A mechanics lien under §8400 attaches to the real property itself, in the amount §8430(a) fixes — the lesser of the reasonable value of the work and the price agreed — and it is enforced by an action brought within 90 days of recording under §8460(a). A stop payment notice goes after money instead: §8520(a) lets a claimant with lien rights other than the direct contractor give the notice to the owner, §8530 lets it go to the construction lender, and §8500 makes this chapter the exclusive route to the construction fund, so nobody may assert any other legal or equitable right against that fund except under a written contract with whoever holds it. (a) has it exactly backwards, and invents a lien against a licence, which does not exist in any form. (b) ignores that the deadlines differ as well as the targets — §8412 and §8414 govern recording a lien and say nothing about giving a notice. (d) invents a substitution: payment ends both remedies, and neither one converts into the other.

§8416(a) lists what a claim of mechanics lien must contain, and every item is about the claim itself: a statement of the claimant's demand after deducting all just credits and offsets, the name of the owner or reputed owner if known, a general statement of the kind of work furnished, the name of the person who employed the claimant or to whom it furnished work, a description of the site sufficient for identification, the claimant's address, a completed proof of service affidavit, and the NOTICE OF MECHANICS LIEN in at least 10-point boldface type — the whole statement signed and verified by the claimant. Nothing in it calls for the owner's loan details, so (a) is invented; nothing calls for other subcontractors' licence numbers, which is (b); and the contract is evidence rather than a lien requirement, which is (c). §8410 is the separate condition that trips claimants up: a lien is enforceable only where the preliminary notice was given and proof of it made.

§8416(e) says it flatly: failure to serve the copy of the claim of mechanics lien as the section prescribes, including the Notice of Mechanics Lien required by §8416(a)(8), causes the claim of lien to be unenforceable as a matter of law. Recording is only half the job, which is (a)'s error. §8416(c) sets out how service is made — registered, certified or first-class mail evidenced by a certificate of mailing, addressed to the owner or reputed owner at a residence or place of business, or at the address shown by the building permit, or as §8174 otherwise provides — and if the owner cannot be served that way, the copy may go to the construction lender or to the original contractor instead. §8416(d) makes service complete when the mail is deposited, which is why the proof of service affidavit required by §8416(a)(7) appears on the face of the lien itself. (c) and (d) invent conversions no section provides: a stop payment notice is a separate remedy the claimant must give for itself, and a money judgment only ever comes from a court.

Stop payment notices on private projects must be served within the same outer deadlines that apply to mechanics' liens: generally within 90 days after completion or cessation of the work of improvement if no Notice of Completion or Cessation is recorded. Recording such a notice shortens these deadlines.

Civil Code §8200 requires every claimant other than the direct contractor and wage laborers to serve the owner, the direct contractor, and the construction lender not later than 20 days after first furnishing labor, service, equipment, or materials; §8204 lets a late notice stand but limits the claim to the 20 days before service and afterwards. (a) leaves out the two recipients whose omission costs the most — without the lender there is no bonded stop payment notice. (c) reverses the sequence, since a notice of completion starts the lien clock rather than the notice clock. (d) uses 90 days, which is the §8412 deadline for recording the lien, not for serving the preliminary notice.

Under Civil Code §8412, a direct contractor must record its mechanics' lien within 90 days after completion of the work of improvement. If the owner records a notice of completion or cessation under §8182, the direct contractor's window is shortened to 60 days after that recording (§8412), and a subcontractor/claimant's window is shortened to 30 days. The 90-day fallback applies when no NOC is recorded. A 1-year window confuses lien recording with the §8460 deadline to foreclose on a recorded lien (90 days to file suit).

Civil Code §8460 requires a claimant to commence an action to enforce a recorded mechanics' lien within 90 days after the lien is recorded; otherwise the lien expires and is unenforceable. The claimant and owner may extend the deadline by written agreement under §8460(b), but only to up to one year from completion. The 180-day option does not exist. The 1-year-from-award and 4-year statute options confuse breach-of-written-contract limitations with the much shorter mechanics'-lien deadline. Missing this 90-day window is one of the most common ways subcontractors lose lien rights.

§3700 requires every California employer to secure the payment of compensation, and it allows exactly two ways to do it: a policy from an insurer admitted to write workers' compensation in this state, or a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations. Failing to do it is a misdemeanour under §3700.5, and the money is serious — §3722(a) assesses $1,500 per employee employed at the moment a stop order issues, and §3722(b) assesses the greater of twice the premium the employer should have paid or that same $1,500 per employee for the period it went uninsured. On the licensing side, B&P §7125 requires a licensee with employees to keep a current certificate on file (until January 1, 2028 a licensee with no employees may file an exemption unless it holds a C-8, C-20, C-22, C-39 or D-49 classification; from that date only a §7029 joint venture with no employees is exempt), and §7125.2 suspends the licence by operation of law from the date coverage was required. (b) is a payroll tax form, (c) is the separate insurance §7071.19 requires of an LLC, and (d) is federal law with a 50-employee threshold.

A §7029 joint venture with no employees may hold an exemption today, and from January 1, 2028 — when the SB 216 version of §7125, postponed from 2026 by SB 1455, takes effect — it will be the ONLY licensee that can; until then other no-employee licensees outside the C-8, C-20, C-22, C-39 and D-49 classifications may file one too. §7125.4 then makes that exemption void by operation of law the moment an employee is hired, and the license is suspended unless a Certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance is on file. There is no grace period to shop for a policy (d), no waiting for renewal (c), and nothing about this requires surrendering the license (b).

The 20-day clock in Civil Code §8200 runs from the date the claimant FIRST FURNISHES labor, service, equipment, or materials — here July 1, so service by about July 21 protects the full claim; §8204 lets a later notice stand but limits recovery to the 20 days before service and afterwards. (b) keys the deadline to the paperwork rather than the delivery, which is the most common and most expensive supplier error, because invoices often go out weeks later. (c) uses a recording date that concerns lien priority, not notice. (d) borrows a notice of commencement from other states; California's scheme uses completion and cessation, not commencement.

Civil Code §9358 obliges the public entity served with a stop payment notice to withhold, from money still owed on the contract, an amount sufficient to answer the claim plus a reasonable allowance for litigation costs, and it is protected when it withholds in good faith. (a) skips the judgment a creditor needs before levying on an account. (b) asks for a remedy the notice does not carry — the contract continues, only the money stops. (c) is the trap the public-works scheme exists to answer: public property cannot be liened, which is why the legislature substituted this notice and the §9550 payment bond.

§8424(b) fixes the bond at 125 percent of the claim of lien — or 125 percent of the amount the claim allocates to the property being released — and requires it to be executed by an admitted surety insurer. On recordation the real property is released from the lien and from any action to enforce it, and the 25 percent margin is there to cover the interest and costs the claimant may recover. The party who records the bond must give the claimant notice with a copy of it, and the claimant then has six months from that notice to sue on the bond, which is a different clock from the 90 days §8460 allows for suing on the lien itself. So (d) is 25 points short, (b) invents a discount for a disputed lien, and (a) is wrong twice over: cash is not required and a surety bond is exactly what the section calls for.

B&P §7071.11(a) is explicit: if the bond is insufficient to pay all claims in full, its sum is distributed to all claimants in proportion to the amount of their respective claims. The same subdivision caps the surety's aggregate liability on wage and fringe-benefit claims at $4,000, so the framer cannot draw more than that from the bond however large the wage claim. (a) is the widespread belief that the bond is a consumer-priority fund — §7071.5 does list homeowners among the beneficiaries, but being a beneficiary is not the same as having priority. (c) applies a first-in-time rule the section does not use. (d) is the most tempting wrong answer, because the section does single out wage claims — but it caps them, it does not prioritise them.

Civil Code §2782.05 voids or limits provisions that require a subcontractor, or its insurer, to insure or indemnify a general contractor or owner for that party's own active negligence, so the endorsement responds to the prime for liability arising out of the sub's work and its share of fault, and the sub's insurer must still defend as to those claims. (a) overstates the statute: the endorsement is limited, not abolished, and additional insured coverage is standard on California jobs. (b) is the very obligation §2782.05 removes. (d) is the belief that the endorsement is a blanket — it is not, and the prime's own policy answers the prime's own negligence.

Civil Code §8400 gives a lien right to a person that provides work authorized for a work of improvement, and lists the direct contractor, subcontractor, material supplier, equipment lessor, laborer, and design professional; §8404 defines authorized work as work requested or agreed to by the owner, or authorized by a direct contractor, subcontractor, architect, project manager, or other person having charge of part of the work. The framing subcontractor is squarely inside that. (b) is the limit that matters: a creditor who contributed nothing to the improvement, such as the contractor's landlord or lender, has no lien. (a) and (c) shrink the class to a single tier, which would leave every subcontractor and supplier without the remedy the chapter was written for.

Civil Code §8412 gives a direct contractor 90 days after completion of the work of improvement to record a mechanics lien when no notice of completion or cessation has been recorded. The shorter deadlines apply only after such a notice is recorded.

Under Civil Code §8414, once a notice of completion (or cessation) is recorded, a claimant other than the direct contractor must record its lien within 30 days. The direct contractor gets 60 days after that notice. Absent any such notice, everyone has 90 days after completion.

Civil Code §8414 gives the direct contractor 60 days after recording of a notice of completion or cessation, while all other claimants get 30 days. If no such notice is recorded, all claimants have 90 days from completion under §8412.

Civil Code §8204(a) says a claimant who did not give preliminary notice is not precluded from giving one later, but is then entitled to record a lien, give a stop payment notice, or claim against a payment bond only for work performed within the 20 days before service, and at any time afterwards. (a) is the harshest misreading — late notice costs the early work, not the remedy. (c) is the mildest, and it ignores the look-back altogether. (b) invents a doubling of the period; nothing in the section extends the 20 days, which is why the practical rule is to serve at the start of every job.

Civil Code §8200 requires a claimant without a direct contract with the owner to serve the preliminary notice on the owner or reputed owner, the direct contractor, and the construction lender if there is one; §8204 makes the notice reach back only 20 days, so late service shortens what can be claimed. (b) omits the owner, whose property the lien attaches to. (c) omits the lender, and that omission specifically costs the claimant the bonded stop payment notice against undisbursed loan funds. (d) confuses the preliminary notice with recording — the preliminary notice is served, not recorded, and serving only the party upstream of you is the most common fatal error.

Civil Code §8200(e)(1) excuses a laborer from giving preliminary notice, and §8200(e)(2) excuses a claimant with a direct contractual relationship with the owner from notifying anyone but the construction lender. §8024 defines laborer as a person who, acting as an employee, performs labor on or bestows skill on a work of improvement, and extends the term to a fund owed part of that compensation. (a), (b) and (c) all lack an owner contract, so each must serve the owner, the direct contractor, and the lender within the §8204(a) 20 days — and an equipment lessor is the one people most often assume is exempt, when §8400(d) gives it a lien right on exactly the same conditions as anyone else.

Civil Code §8200(e) excuses a direct contractor from serving the owner — the contract itself gives the owner notice — but the direct contractor must still give the preliminary notice to a construction lender to preserve rights against the construction funds. (a) inverts the flow: notice runs up the chain toward the people who control the money, not down it. (b) applies the general rule without reading the exception, and is the trap for anyone who memorised '20 days' alone. (c) over-reads the exception, which covers only the owner and not the lender.

Once paid, the claimant records a release of the mechanics lien, and that recorded release is what clears the lien from title. An owner who cannot obtain one has two statutory routes: record a lien release bond of 125 percent of the claim under §8424, which shifts the claimant's remedy from the land to the bond, or, once the claimant's 90 days under §8460 have run without an action, petition for a release order under §8480. (b) is a completion event under §8180(a)(4), which starts deadlines rather than ending a lien. (c) is the §8444 notice an owner who did not contract for the work posts and records within 10 days of learning of it. (d) is the §8200 notice served at the outset to preserve lien rights.

Civil Code §8460 requires the claimant to commence an action to foreclose the mechanics lien within 90 days after recording. If no suit is filed in time (absent a recorded extension), the lien expires and is unenforceable.

A stop payment notice under Civil Code §8500 et seq. directs the owner, or a bonded notice directs the construction lender, to withhold money not yet paid out and hold it against the claim; §8534 sets the owner's duty to withhold. (a) confuses two securities — a claim on the §7071.6 license bond is made against the surety, not through a stop payment notice. (b) describes the mechanics lien, which attaches to the property itself; the point of the stop payment notice is that it reaches the money instead. (c) assumes a levy right that only a judgment creditor has.

Civil Code §8532 obligates a construction lender to withhold only on a bonded stop payment notice, accompanied by a surety bond of 125 percent of the claim; the bond protects the lender if the claim turns out to be bad. (a) is the closest trap: form and verification matter, but no amount of formality substitutes for the bond. (b) reverses the order — the notice works without going to court, which is why it is useful. (c) borrows mechanics lien practice, where recording is the operative act; a stop payment notice is served, not recorded. A notice to the owner under §8534 needs no bond.

A payment bond guarantees payment down the chain: §8608 gives the right of recovery to claimants who provided work to the direct contractor, directly or through one or more subcontractors, and §8612 conditions the claim on the preliminary notice the lien law requires. (a) and (b) both describe a performance bond, which answers to the owner for completion and quality — the two bonds are usually bought together and confusing them is the classic error. (c) is not a bonded obligation at all; financing costs are the owner's own.

Labor Code §3700 requires every employer to secure the payment of compensation, by insurance or by a certificate of consent to self-insure, and one employee triggers it; B&P §7125 then makes a current certificate of workers' compensation insurance or of self-insurance on file with the board a condition of the license itself. A licensee with NO employees may file an exemption statement instead until January 1, 2028, unless it holds a C-8, C-20, C-22, C-39 or D-49 classification; from that date SB 216, as postponed by SB 1455 (Stats. 2024, ch. 485), requires coverage of every licensee except a §7029 joint venture that employs nobody. General liability, commercial auto, and builder's risk are routinely required by contract, by a lender, or by the Vehicle Code for the vehicles themselves, but none of them is made mandatory for contractors by the license law, and none of them pays an injured worker's benefits.

B&P §7125(b), as amended by SB 1455 (Stats. 2024, ch. 485), lets a licensee with no employees file an exemption statement instead of carrying coverage — but only if it does not hold a C-8, C-20, C-22, C-39 or D-49 classification. A roofer is on that list, so the C-39 holder must carry workers' compensation or a certification of self-insurance even with nobody on the payroll (d). (b) is the rule for a painter or a Class B contractor with no employees, and it is the trap here: the classification is what decides it. The list stops mattering on January 1, 2028, when the SB 216 version of §7125 becomes operative and every licensee must carry coverage except a §7029 joint venture with no employees — the roofer's answer is the same either way. (a) and (c) name real policies that cover other risks: general liability answers to third parties, builder's risk to property damage during construction, and neither substitutes for workers' compensation.

Commercial general liability answers for bodily injury and property damage suffered by third parties and arising out of the contractor's operations or completed work, together with the duty to defend those claims. (a) is business income coverage, and a liability policy insures what the contractor owes others rather than what the contractor failed to earn. (b) is workers' compensation, which the CGL expressly excludes. (c) is first-party property coverage — inland marine or a tools floater. Note too the 'your work' exclusion: the CGL does not pay to redo the contractor's own defective workmanship.

Builder's risk is property insurance on the structure and the materials while the project is under way, against perils such as fire, theft, vandalism, and wind; it insures the work itself, and it ends when the project is finished. (b) is the owner's permanent property and liability program, which takes over at occupancy. (c) is commercial general liability, which answers for third-party bodily injury and property damage. (d) is workers' compensation. The line to hold is property coverage on the work versus liability coverage for harm to others.

A certificate of insurance is an informational snapshot: it says that a described policy was in force when the certificate was issued, and it neither amends the policy nor creates rights. (a) is the single most expensive misconception in construction risk transfer — additional insured status comes from an endorsement to the policy, and the certificate merely reports it. (b) reads the 'cancellation notice' box as a promise; most modern certificates disclaim any duty to notify. (c) mistakes the summary for the contract; only the policy and its endorsements grant coverage.