Explorar todas las preguntas

An umbrella or excess policy sits above scheduled underlying policies — commercial general liability, commercial auto, often employers' liability — and pays only after those limits are exhausted, which is how a contractor reaches catastrophic-claim limits without buying them at the primary layer. (c) inverts that structure. (a) confuses liability limits with workers' compensation, which is statutory, separate, and not something an umbrella replaces. (d) names the risk the CGL's 'your work' exclusion leaves with the contractor, and an umbrella follows the underlying policy's terms rather than curing its exclusions.

Civil Code §8416(a) requires a written statement, signed and verified by the claimant, containing the claimant's demand after deducting all just credits and offsets, the name of the owner or reputed owner if known, a general statement of the kind of work furnished, the name of the person who employed the claimant, a description of the site sufficient for identification, the claimant's address, and a proof of service affidavit; the statutory Notice of Mechanics Lien must be served with it. §8422 forgives erroneous information about the demand, the credits, the work, or the site unless the court finds the claimant intended to defraud, or a party without actual knowledge was misled to its prejudice. The other three answers are records no lien requires and that do nothing to identify the claim.

A contractor's own commercial general liability policy insures it against covered third-party bodily injury and property damage arising from its operations, whether or not anyone has named it on another policy. (a) and (c) reverse the direction of additional insured coverage — that status usually runs upward, giving the owner and prime access to the sub's insurer, not the other way round. (b) confuses the two coverages: workers' compensation answers injuries to the contractor's own employees, and third parties are not employees.

Notice to the lender is what keeps the fund-based remedy alive: a bonded stop payment notice under §8532 obliges the lender to withhold loan money it has not yet disbursed. (b) is the closest trap because lien priority is a real and valuable question, but priority turns on when work commenced relative to recording of the deed of trust, not on whom the preliminary notice went to. (c) reverses the point of the notice, which is to stop money rather than release it. (d) invents a claim against the lender's own insurance.

Public property cannot be sold to satisfy a private claim, so the legislature substituted two remedies: the direct contractor's payment bond and a stop payment notice served on the public entity against funds still unpaid. (d) is the sharpest distractor, because both bonds are posted on the same job — but the performance bond answers to the public entity for completion, and a sub is not its beneficiary. (a) concerns work ordered by someone other than the owner. (b) is first-party property insurance on the work itself and pays no one for unpaid labour or materials.

Recording a release bond under Civil Code §8424 substitutes the bond for the property, so the claimant's action runs against the surety and the principal rather than against title. (d) is the step the bond was recorded to foreclose, and pursuing it is the error the section exists to prevent. (a) misroutes a claim: the §7071.6 licence bond is claimed against its surety, and the CSLB holds no money. (c) reaches the wrong party — funds in the lender's hands are the target of a bonded stop payment notice, a separate remedy with its own notice conditions.

Coverage B of a workers' compensation policy answers employee-injury liability that the no-fault benefit system does not resolve — third-party-over actions, consequential claims by family members, and dual-capacity claims. (a) is Coverage A of the same policy, the statutory benefits themselves, and mistaking the two is the whole point of the item. (c) is commercial general liability, which excludes injury to employees precisely because this coverage handles it. (d) is a wage claim, which is neither an injury nor insured under a workers' compensation policy.

With no notice of completion or cessation recorded, Civil Code §8412 gives the direct contractor 90 days from completion to record. Counting 90 days from March 1 lands near the end of May.

Checking the certificate before the sub mobilizes verifies that the required coverage exists at the moment exposure begins, when it is still possible to keep an uninsured sub off the site. (a) confuses receiving a document with buying a policy. (b) reads the certificate as controlling the insurer, which it does not — cancellation rights live in the policy. (c) reverses the transfer: the purpose is to reach the sub's insurer for the sub's work, not to spend the general contractor's own limits on it.

The two bonds are issued together and answer different failures: the payment bond guarantees that subcontractors and suppliers are paid, and the performance bond guarantees to the owner that the work is completed according to the contract. (a) invents schedule and budget guarantees neither bond gives. (c) is half-right and therefore the strongest distractor — reduced lien exposure is a real benefit to the owner, but it is a consequence of subs being paid, and no bond exists to protect the surety. (d) reverses both beneficiaries.

Civil Code §8416(a)(5) requires a description of the site sufficient for identification; a street address usually does, and a legal description removes all doubt. §8422 then forgives an erroneous site description unless the court finds the claimant intended to defraud, or that a party without actual knowledge of the mistake was misled to its prejudice. (a) and (b) appear nowhere in the section. (d) is close enough to be tempting — §8416(a)(2) requires the owner's name if known and (a)(6) requires the CLAIMANT's address — but the owner's mailing address and phone number are not what identifies the property.

An additional insured endorsement lets the owner or general contractor tender a claim arising out of the subcontractor's work to the subcontractor's insurer and obtain a defense and indemnity under that policy, subject to its terms and limits. (a) is the dangerous reading: risk transfer supplements your own coverage and never excuses it. (b) confuses insurance with cost allocation — adding insureds does not reduce the premium. (c) describes a performance bond, which is a surety obligation rather than an insurance one.

Civil Code §8400(f) lists the design professional among the persons with a mechanics lien right for work provided to a work of improvement, subject to the same preliminary notice condition in §8410 and the recording deadlines in §8412 and §8414. California also gives design professionals a separate remedy in §8300 et seq. for design services furnished before construction starts, which §8302(c) allows only where a building permit or other governmental approval has been obtained using those services. (a) ignores both routes. (b) reverses the remedies, and a design professional's stop payment notice rights are expressly preserved in §8608(b). (c) confuses property insurance with a payment remedy.

Only the insurer can add an insured to a policy, and it does so by endorsement; a certificate is a broker's evidence of coverage and its own wording disclaims amending the policy. (d) is the substitute owners most often settle for — a notice provision tells the owner when coverage is ending, it does not make the owner an insured or give it a right to defense. (a) and (b) belong to other transactions entirely, one in the lien law and the other in a credit file.

A stop payment notice is served, not recorded; it directs the owner or lender to withhold funds. A mechanics lien, by contrast, is recorded against the property. Both require a valid underlying claim by someone who furnished work and proper service.

Labor Code §2775(b)(1) treats a worker as an employee unless the hiring entity proves all three parts of the ABC test, and §2781 sets the narrower conditions for construction subcontractors; the label on the paperwork settles nothing. An employer that owed coverage and had none faces the civil action §3706 allows, in which §3708 presumes the injury was caused by the employer's negligence and removes the usual defenses, plus §3700.5 misdemeanor exposure and suspension of the license under B&P §7125.2. (a) understates the exposure by orders of magnitude. (b) is the label-as-conclusion error the ABC test forecloses. (d) misreads the commercial general liability policy, which excludes bodily injury to the insured's own employees precisely because workers' compensation answers it.

Civil Code §8204(a) provides that a claimant who did not give preliminary notice is not precluded from giving one later, but is then entitled to claim only for work performed within the 20 days prior to service of the notice, and at any time thereafter. Service on Day 40 therefore protects deliveries from roughly Day 20 forward, and the deliveries from Day 1 to Day 19 fall outside the window. (b) treats a late notice as fatal, which the subdivision expressly says it is not. (c) ignores the look-back altogether. (a) counts 20 days forward from service instead of backward, which protects nothing the statute protects.

A mechanics lien ultimately requires a foreclosure action against the owner's real property to collect, making it more cumbersome than a stop payment notice (reaching funds) or a payment bond claim (reaching a surety). Claimants often pursue funds or bonds first.

Civil Code §8414 gives a claimant other than the direct contractor 30 days after a recorded notice of completion; miss it and the lien remedy is gone, though a payment bond claim, a timely stop payment notice, or a plain breach-of-contract action may remain. (a) borrows the direct contractor's 60-day period under §8412, which is not available to lower-tier claimants. (c) is the no-notice rule the recording displaced. (d) states the §8460 deadline for suing on a lien already recorded, which never revives a lien that was recorded too late.

A commercial general liability policy excludes bodily injury to an employee arising out of employment, because that injury belongs to workers' compensation, with Coverage B employers' liability picking up the suits the no-fault system does not resolve. (a), (b) and (c) are exactly what the CGL is bought for: third-party bodily injury and property damage arising out of the contractor's operations. The line is who was hurt, not how badly or where — an employee framing the same wall as the injured visitor produces a workers' compensation claim, not a CGL claim.

Under Civil Code §8600 et seq. the right to recover on a private-work payment bond tracks the notice conditions for a mechanics lien, so a claimant who had to give a preliminary notice must have given it — laborers and others excused from notice are excused here too. (a) imports the §8532 bond that accompanies a stop payment notice to a lender. (c) treats the remedies as sequential when they are alternative; a claimant may go against the bond without ever recording. (d) would make the bond useless, since its value is being payable without first litigating to judgment.

Insurance transfers the insured's own fortuitous losses to an insurer that does not expect repayment; a bond is a three-party guarantee running to an obligee, and the surety expects the principal to reimburse what it pays. Projects carry both because the risks do not overlap. (a) and (b) each describe insurance and then attach the label to both instruments. (c) mistakes who a bond protects — the owner is typically the obligee the bond runs to, so the bond protects the owner from the contractor, not the reverse.

A claimant that has been paid should execute and record a release, and an unreleased lien clouds the owner's title until it does. The owner's statutory remedy is the petition in Civil Code §8480: once the claimant has let the 90 days in §8460 pass without commencing an action to enforce the lien, the owner may petition for an order releasing the property, the claimant carries the burden of proving the lien's validity under §8488(a), and §8488(c) awards the prevailing party reasonable attorney's fees. §8494 then strips an expired lien of any effect as notice. (a) ignores the practical problem the statute addresses, since the cloud on title bites long before anything expires. (b) invents a treble-damages penalty this remedy does not carry. (d) names the wrong party's loss: the harm runs to the owner whose title is clouded, not to the contractor.

$25,000 is the contractor's bond every active licensee must keep on file under B&P §7071.6 — and the same figure is the minimum disciplinary bond under §7071.8 and the amount of the qualifying individual's bond under §7071.9. (b) is the real neighbor and the reason this item is worth asking: Civil Code §9550(a) requires a payment bond on a public works contract involving an expenditure in excess of $25,000, the identical number doing an unrelated job. (a) invents a statutory cap on liens; a lien is in the amount of the claimant's demand. (d) invents a CSLB insurance requirement — the only insurance the license law compels is workers' compensation under §7125, plus the limited liability company's liability policy under §7071.19.

SB 216 (Stats. 2022, ch. 978) wrote a version of §7125 that requires every licensee to carry workers' compensation or self-insurance whatever its classification, leaving only a §7029 joint venture with no employees exempt, and set it to start on January 1, 2026. SB 1455 (Stats. 2024, ch. 485) rewrote that start date: the new section "shall become operative on January 1, 2028" (b), and the interim §7125 — a no-employee exemption available to everyone except C-8, C-20, C-22, C-39 and D-49 holders — stays in effect until then. (a) is the original SB 216 date, which is why so much study material still states the all-licensee rule as current. (c) is a real date in the same bill, but for something else: by January 1, 2027 §7125.7 requires the board to establish a process to verify that licensees claiming the no-employee exemption are eligible. (d) is not a date either bill uses.

Until January 1, 2028, B&P §7125(b), as amended by SB 1455 (Stats. 2024, ch. 485), exempts an applicant or licensee that has no employees and files the Registrar's exemption statement — but only if it does not hold a C-8 (concrete), C-20 (warm-air heating, ventilating and air-conditioning), C-22 (asbestos abatement), C-39 (roofing) or D-49 (tree service) license. A C-33 painter is not on that list, so (c) may file. (a), (b) and (d) are on it: those holders must carry workers' compensation or a certification of self-insurance whether or not they employ anyone, and CSLB will not accept an exemption from them. From January 1, 2028 the list stops mattering, because the SB 216 version of §7125 requires every licensee to carry coverage except a §7029 joint venture with no employees — the painter included.

Section 3722 assesses twice, on two different triggers. Subdivision (a) is issued together with the stop order, before anyone is hurt, at $1,500 per employee employed when the order is issued and served. Subdivision (d)(2) then adds $10,000 per employee employed on the date of injury once a claim is found compensable. The $100,000 in subdivision (f) is a CEILING on the total of these assessments, not a penalty in its own right, and the criminal exposure under §3700.5 sits on top of all of it.

These are the two halves of one bargain. Section 3600(a) makes the employer liable for compensation WITHOUT REGARD TO NEGLIGENCE, so an injured worker who was partly or wholly careless still collects. Section 3602(a) is the price of that: the compensation claim is the sole and exclusive remedy against the employer, so the negligence suit does not lie. The narrow exceptions are elsewhere — a willful physical assault by the employer, fraudulent concealment, a defective product the employer made, or an employer that never secured coverage at all.

Two clocks run from two different events. The employer had one working day from notice of the injury to hand the worker a claim form. Once the worker FILES that form, §5402(c) gives the employer one working day to authorize all treatment consistent with the applicable guidelines, so a Wednesday filing means Thursday. Liability for that treatment is limited to $10,000 until the claim is accepted or rejected — the money is spent before anyone decides the claim, which is the point of it. Ninety days is a different deadline: it is when an unrejected claim becomes presumed compensable.

Civil Code §8302 creates a lien on the site for a design professional NOTWITHSTANDING the absence of commencement of the planned work of improvement — that is exactly the situation the chapter exists for. The conditions are all present here: a person described in §8014 (a registered professional engineer), services under a written contract with the landowner, a building permit or other governmental approval obtained in furtherance of the work, and the contracting landowner still owning the site when the claim of lien is recorded. Had no permit been obtained, no lien could be created at all.

California requiere un contrato escrito de mejoras del hogar para cualquier trabajo en propiedad residencial que totalice $500 o más, incluyendo tanto mano de obra como materiales (B&P §7159). Nota: este umbral de $500 para el contrato por escrito es un número DISTINTO del umbral de $1,000 para trabajo menor sin licencia del §7048 — la SB 517 modificó el §7159 para 2026 (reglas de divulgación de subcontratistas), pero mantuvo esta cifra de $500; no confunda ambos.

El derecho de rescisión de tres días aplica a contratos solicitados y firmados en el domicilio del consumidor. El propietario tiene hasta la medianoche del tercer día hábil para cancelar sin penalidad.

El B&P §7159(d)(1) exige que el contrato de mejoras del hogar lleve el nombre, la dirección comercial y el número de licencia del contratista; el resto de la lista de (d) añade el precio del contrato, la descripción del proyecto y los materiales significativos, el calendario de pagos por avance y las fechas aproximadas de inicio y finalización. La ley no pide la fecha de vencimiento de la licencia. Tampoco pide el sello del arquitecto, que es del trámite de planos; una lista de subcontratistas, que queda en los archivos del contratista; ni un número de póliza de compensación laboral, que acredita el certificado del asegurador.

El B&P §7159(d) exige que un contrato de mejoras del hogar y cualquier cambio a él consten por escrito y firmados por las partes antes de comenzar el trabajo que el cambio cubre, y el §7159(c)(5) añade que el formulario de orden de cambio pasa a formar parte del contrato solo en esas condiciones. Una factura enviada después documenta un cobro, no un acuerdo previo. El departamento de construcción revisa el cumplimiento del código y expide permisos; no tiene papel alguno en hacer exigible un cambio de precio entre dueño y contratista. Y ninguna disposición obliga a presentar las órdenes de cambio ante el CSLB, ni en 10 días ni en ningún plazo.

Un contratista no puede exigir ni aceptar el pago final hasta que el proyecto esté sustancialmente completo. Exigir el pago antes de este punto es una violación.

Las cláusulas de arbitraje están permitidas pero deben divulgarse claramente, escritas en al menos tipo negrilla de 10 puntos en contratos de mejoras del hogar, y rubricadas por separado por el propietario.

El abandono de una obra sin excusa legal es en sí mismo causa de acción disciplinaria según el B&P §7107, de modo que la suspensión o revocación está en juego; y un depósito recibido para la obra y gastado en otra cosa puede perseguirse bajo el Código Penal §484b como desviación de fondos de construcción, un delito menor hasta $2,350 y castigado con más severidad por encima de esa cifra. Una multa que deja intacta la licencia, una simple orden de reembolso y una carta de advertencia se quedan cortas frente a la disciplina que el §7107 autoriza.

Es la responsabilidad profesional del contratista asegurarse de que todos los permisos requeridos se obtengan antes de que comience el trabajo. Trabajar sin los permisos requeridos es una violación de la licencia.

Una cláusula de fuerza mayor exime a una parte del cumplimiento cuando eventos extraordinarios fuera de su control impiden la finalización oportuna.

El Código Civil §1671(b) hace válida la cláusula de daños liquidados salvo que quien la impugne establezca que el monto era irrazonable en las circunstancias existentes al momento de celebrarse el contrato, de modo que la razonabilidad se juzga al firmar. Un monto fijado alto para disuadir o castigar es la penalidad clásica que no pasa esa prueba. Exigir prueba de los daños reales exactos anula el propósito de liquidarlos por adelantado. Y poner iniciales o renunciar al arbitraje nada tiene que ver con el §1671.

El §8200 del Código Civil convierte el aviso preliminar en condición de los derechos de gravamen: si se da, el reclamante puede registrar un gravamen mecánico cuando no se le paga; si se omite, el gravamen se pierde por mucho que valga la obra. No es una exigencia de pago ni un aviso de suspensión de pago, que es el remedio aparte para congelar fondos de construcción aún no desembolsados. El permiso de construcción lo emite el departamento de edificación para el cumplimiento del código y nada tiene que ver. Y el aviso no gana tiempo: el plazo de 90 días para registrar el gravamen tras la terminación corre por su cuenta según el §8412.

Un contrato de tiempo y materiales paga al contratista las horas de mano de obra realmente trabajadas a una tarifa acordada, más el costo real de los materiales, más un margen o tarifa acordada por gastos generales y ganancia; el total no queda fijado de antemano. Un precio fijado antes de empezar es un contrato a suma alzada, el arreglo opuesto. Pagar solo materiales describe una compra de suministro, no un contrato de construcción. Y una tarifa horaria sin reembolso de materiales es un trato de solo mano de obra o por precio unitario, en el que el contratista absorbe todo el costo del material.

Bajo un contrato de precio fijo (suma alzada) el contratista promete un resultado terminado por un solo precio, así que todo sobrecosto - productividad de la mano de obra, alza de materiales, retrabajos - cae sobre el contratista. El costo más honorarios fijos lo invierte: el propietario reembolsa los costos reales y el honorario está fijado, de modo que el propietario asume el sobrecosto. El de tiempo y materiales factura horas y materiales según se incurren, y otra vez el riesgo de costo queda con quien paga las facturas. El de precio por unidad fija solo la tarifa por unidad instalada; el riesgo de cantidad sigue siendo del propietario y el contratista solo se expone en su propia productividad por unidad.

Cuando un subcontratista incumple, el remedio contractual del principal es terminar ese subcontrato, hacer que otros terminen el alcance y recuperar la diferencia del sub incumplidor — o de su fianza de cumplimiento, si la otorgó. (a) La disciplina del CSLB puede suspender o revocar la licencia del sub, pero el Registrador no tiene poder para ordenar que se termine el trabajo ni para resarcir al principal; eso corresponde a un tribunal o a un árbitro. (d) Una orden de cambio traslada el costo al dueño, que ni causó el incumplimiento ni aceptó pagar dos veces por el mismo alcance. (c) Irse es peor que inútil: abandonar un proyecto sin excusa legal es por sí mismo causa de disciplina bajo el B&P §7107, de modo que el principal cambiaría un reclamo de cobro por un problema de licencia.

En obras privadas, los propietarios deben pagar a los contratistas generales dentro de 30 días de una factura adecuada no disputada.

El B&P §7108.5 da al contratista directo 7 días desde la recepción de un pago de avance para traspasar a cada subcontratista su parte (b), y el §7108.5(b) impone una multa del 2% mensual más honorarios de abogado sobre los montos retenidos indebidamente. (c) Los 10 días son el plazo separado del Código Civil §8814 para liberar al subcontratista la RETENCIÓN retenida una vez que el propietario la libera: otro pago bajo otra ley, razón por la cual el enunciado especifica el pago de avance. (a) 3 días y (d) 30 días no figuran en ninguna de las dos secciones; 30 días es el tipo de plazo que un contrato privado podría intentar imponer, pero el §7108.5 no puede rebajarse por acuerdo hasta ahí.

La Ley del Derecho a Reparar de California (SB 800) establece: 1 año para la mayoría de los componentes, 4 años para plomería/electricidad/mecánica, 10 años para defectos estructurales.

California limita el pago inicial de un contrato de mejoras del hogar a $1,000 o el 10% del precio del contrato, lo que sea MENOR. Aquí el 10% sería $4,000, por lo que rige el tope menor de $1,000.

El pago inicial no puede exceder $1,000 o el 10% del precio del contrato, lo que sea menor. El 10% de $6,000 es $600, que es menos de $1,000, por lo que $600 es el máximo legal.

Los contratos de mejoras del hogar deben indicar la descripción del trabajo, el calendario de pagos y las fechas de inicio/finalización, entre otros. El ingreso del propietario es información financiera privada y nunca es un término requerido.